Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Rh/Hoedull Cells and Their Progeny 6 Weeks Posttransplant
| Section No. Analyzed3-150 . | Central Marrow Region . | Endosteal Region . |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | − | + |
| 2 | − | − |
| 3 | − | − |
| 4 | − | + |
| 5 | − | − |
| 6 | − | + |
| 7 | − | + |
| 8 | − | + |
| 9 | − | + |
| 10 | − | − |
| 11 | − | + |
| 12 | − | + |
| 13 | − | + |
| 14 | − | − |
| Section No. Analyzed3-150 . | Central Marrow Region . | Endosteal Region . |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | − | + |
| 2 | − | − |
| 3 | − | − |
| 4 | − | + |
| 5 | − | − |
| 6 | − | + |
| 7 | − | + |
| 8 | − | + |
| 9 | − | + |
| 10 | − | − |
| 11 | − | + |
| 12 | − | + |
| 13 | − | + |
| 14 | − | − |
P < .004 using a two-side paired-sample sign test, based on the assumption that donor cells have an equal probability of being in the central marrow region as at the endosteal surface (defined as 12 cells from the femoral marrow interface).27
Abbreviations: − Represents no donor cells detected; + cells of donor origin detected.
Sections were analyzed from at least 4 different mice from 3 different experiments.