Univariable and multivariable analysis of baseline and therapy-related characteristics by severity of CRS
Characteristic . | CRS grade . | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 . | 1-3 . | 4-5 . | Total . | . | . | |||||||||||||||||
No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | Univariable P* . | Multivariable P† . | |
No. of patients | 40 | 83 | 10 | 133 | ||||||||||||||||||
Age, years | 56 | 44-65 | 27-70 | 54 | 43-61 | 20-73 | 53.5 | 43-62 | 20-70 | 54 | 43-62 | 20-73 | .55 | — | ||||||||
Sex | .79 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Male | 28 | 30 | 59 | 63 | 6 | 7 | 93 | 70 | ||||||||||||||
Female | 12 | 30 | 24 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 40 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Karnofsky performance score | .30 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
60-70 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 71 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
80-90 | 32 | 30 | 67 | 63 | 7 | 7 | 106 | 80 | ||||||||||||||
100 | 6 | 46 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Disease type | .30 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | 12 | 25 | 31 | 66 | 4 | 9 | 47 | 35 | ||||||||||||||
CLL | 4 | 17 | 18 | 75 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
NHL | 24 | 39 | 34 | 55 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Prior lines of therapy | 3 | 2-5 | 1-11 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-11 | 5 | 3-7 | 2-9 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-11 | .13 | — | ||||||||
Prior transplant | .38‡ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allogeneic only | 3 | 12 | 21 | 84 | 1 | 4 | 25 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
Autologous only | 9 | 41 | 11 | 50 | 2 | 9 | 22 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
Both | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Marrow disease burden by flow cytometry (%) | 0 | 0-1.3 | 0-79 | 20 | 0-65 | 0-97 | 21 | 3.6-40 | 0-89.8 | 1.3 | 0-42 | 0-97 | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||||||||
Not involved | 23 | 47 | 25 | 51 | 1 | 2 | 49 | 37 | ||||||||||||||
CD19+ cells in marrow by flow cytometry | 3.6 | 1.3-6.6 | 0-79 | 22 | 3.0-66 | 0-99 | 22 | 11-40 | 0.3-90 | 8.8 | 2.2-48 | 0-99 | .0001§ | - | ||||||||
Platelet count (1000/μL) | 98 | 58-159 | 11-265 | 69 | 38-119 | 1-553 | 32 | 19-85 | 5-162 | 77 | 40-133 | 1-553 | .002 | .05 | ||||||||
CD8+ selection method | .001 | .03 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bulk CD8+ | 9 | 15 | 47 | 77 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 46 | ||||||||||||||
Central memory enriched | 31 | 43 | 36 | 50 | 5 | 7 | 72 | 54 | ||||||||||||||
Lymphodepletion | .67 | .02 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cyclophosphamide/fludarabine based | 30 | 29 | 65 | 62 | 9 | 9 | 104 | 78 | ||||||||||||||
Not cyclophosphamide/fludarabine based | 10 | 35 | 18 | 62 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
CAR T-cell dose | .002 | .003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 × 105 EGFRt+ cells per kg | 10 | 29 | 25 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 26 | ||||||||||||||
2 × 106 EGFRt+ cells per kg | 27 | 31 | 54 | 63 | 5 | 6 | 86 | 65 | ||||||||||||||
2 × 107 EGFRt+ cells per kg | 3 | 25 | 4 | 33 | 5 | 42 | 12 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Lymphodepletion/CAR T-cell dose interaction effect|| | .03 | .009 |
Characteristic . | CRS grade . | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 . | 1-3 . | 4-5 . | Total . | . | . | |||||||||||||||||
No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | No. . | % . | Median . | IQR . | Range . | Univariable P* . | Multivariable P† . | |
No. of patients | 40 | 83 | 10 | 133 | ||||||||||||||||||
Age, years | 56 | 44-65 | 27-70 | 54 | 43-61 | 20-73 | 53.5 | 43-62 | 20-70 | 54 | 43-62 | 20-73 | .55 | — | ||||||||
Sex | .79 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Male | 28 | 30 | 59 | 63 | 6 | 7 | 93 | 70 | ||||||||||||||
Female | 12 | 30 | 24 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 40 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Karnofsky performance score | .30 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
60-70 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 71 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
80-90 | 32 | 30 | 67 | 63 | 7 | 7 | 106 | 80 | ||||||||||||||
100 | 6 | 46 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Disease type | .30 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | 12 | 25 | 31 | 66 | 4 | 9 | 47 | 35 | ||||||||||||||
CLL | 4 | 17 | 18 | 75 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
NHL | 24 | 39 | 34 | 55 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Prior lines of therapy | 3 | 2-5 | 1-11 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-11 | 5 | 3-7 | 2-9 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-11 | .13 | — | ||||||||
Prior transplant | .38‡ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allogeneic only | 3 | 12 | 21 | 84 | 1 | 4 | 25 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
Autologous only | 9 | 41 | 11 | 50 | 2 | 9 | 22 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
Both | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Marrow disease burden by flow cytometry (%) | 0 | 0-1.3 | 0-79 | 20 | 0-65 | 0-97 | 21 | 3.6-40 | 0-89.8 | 1.3 | 0-42 | 0-97 | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||||||||
Not involved | 23 | 47 | 25 | 51 | 1 | 2 | 49 | 37 | ||||||||||||||
CD19+ cells in marrow by flow cytometry | 3.6 | 1.3-6.6 | 0-79 | 22 | 3.0-66 | 0-99 | 22 | 11-40 | 0.3-90 | 8.8 | 2.2-48 | 0-99 | .0001§ | - | ||||||||
Platelet count (1000/μL) | 98 | 58-159 | 11-265 | 69 | 38-119 | 1-553 | 32 | 19-85 | 5-162 | 77 | 40-133 | 1-553 | .002 | .05 | ||||||||
CD8+ selection method | .001 | .03 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bulk CD8+ | 9 | 15 | 47 | 77 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 46 | ||||||||||||||
Central memory enriched | 31 | 43 | 36 | 50 | 5 | 7 | 72 | 54 | ||||||||||||||
Lymphodepletion | .67 | .02 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cyclophosphamide/fludarabine based | 30 | 29 | 65 | 62 | 9 | 9 | 104 | 78 | ||||||||||||||
Not cyclophosphamide/fludarabine based | 10 | 35 | 18 | 62 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
CAR T-cell dose | .002 | .003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 × 105 EGFRt+ cells per kg | 10 | 29 | 25 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 26 | ||||||||||||||
2 × 106 EGFRt+ cells per kg | 27 | 31 | 54 | 63 | 5 | 6 | 86 | 65 | ||||||||||||||
2 × 107 EGFRt+ cells per kg | 3 | 25 | 4 | 33 | 5 | 42 | 12 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Lymphodepletion/CAR T-cell dose interaction effect|| | .03 | .009 |
IQR, interquartile range.
Two-sided P values were calculated by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
Step-wise multivariable proportional odds models were performed to assess the impact of baseline factors on the occurrence of CRS (grade 0 vs 1-3 vs 4-5), where log10 values were used to transform data as appropriate, with 0.001 substituting for values of 0.
Any transplant type vs no transplant.
Because marrow disease burden and total CD19+ cells in marrow have a strong correlation (r = 0.99; P < .0001), only marrow disease was included in the multivariable analysis.
The interaction effect demonstrates that at increasing CAR T-cell dose levels, the incorporation of fludarabine into the lymphodepleting regimen has a greater association with CRS.