Table 3.

Comparison between Shimoyama’s classification and the simplified iATL-PI

Shimoyama’s classification
Smoldering typeFavorable chronic typeUnfavorable chronic type
n%n%n%
iATL-PI       
 Low risk 42 35.6 8 18.6 1 1.0 
 Intermediate risk 67 56.8 30 69.8 42 39.6 
 High risk 9 7.6 5 11.6 63 59.4 
 Total 118 100.0 43 100.0 106 100.0 
Shimoyama’s classification
Smoldering typeFavorable chronic typeUnfavorable chronic type
n%n%n%
iATL-PI       
 Low risk 42 35.6 8 18.6 1 1.0 
 Intermediate risk 67 56.8 30 69.8 42 39.6 
 High risk 9 7.6 5 11.6 63 59.4 
 Total 118 100.0 43 100.0 106 100.0 
View Large
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal