Table 2.

Results of variable selection by the MFP model in training samples-A

VariatesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR95% CIP valueHR95% CIP valueRegression coefficient
LowerUpperLowerUpper
Sex          
 Male 1.00         
 Female 0.5092 0.2902 0.8933 .0186      
ECOG performance status          
 0-1 1.00         
 2-4 3.0622 1.4447 6.4904 .0035      
Neutrophil count          
 Continuous 1.0001 1.0000 1.0001 .0020      
log10(sIL2R [U/mL])          
 Continuous 4.5443 2.7466 7.5187 <.0001 4.5443 2.7466 7.5187 <.0001 1.5139 
Number of lymph node lesions          
 Continuous 1.1936 1.0462 1.3617 .0085      
Shimoyama’s classification          
 Smoldering 1.0000         
 Chronic 1.6130 0.9626 2.7027 .0695      
VariatesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR95% CIP valueHR95% CIP valueRegression coefficient
LowerUpperLowerUpper
Sex          
 Male 1.00         
 Female 0.5092 0.2902 0.8933 .0186      
ECOG performance status          
 0-1 1.00         
 2-4 3.0622 1.4447 6.4904 .0035      
Neutrophil count          
 Continuous 1.0001 1.0000 1.0001 .0020      
log10(sIL2R [U/mL])          
 Continuous 4.5443 2.7466 7.5187 <.0001 4.5443 2.7466 7.5187 <.0001 1.5139 
Number of lymph node lesions          
 Continuous 1.1936 1.0462 1.3617 .0085      
Shimoyama’s classification          
 Smoldering 1.0000         
 Chronic 1.6130 0.9626 2.7027 .0695      

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal