Table 4.

Multivariable analysis for event-free survival

VariablePRelative hazard ratio ± SEConfidence interval
 <.001   
Clofarabine treatment .037 0.83 ± 0.08 0.69-0.99 
Age <.001 1.03 ± 0.0 1.02-1.03 
White blood cell count <.001 1.17 ± 0.04 1.10-1.25 
ELN intermediate risk I <.001 2.10 ± 0.30 1.59-2.78 
ELN intermediate risk II <.001 1.95 ± 0.30 1.45-2.63 
ELN adverse risk <.001 3.99 ± 060 2.97-5.35 
Secondary AML .0072 1.49 ± 0.22 1.11-1.98 
Treatment-related AML .91 1.02 ± 022 0.68-1.55 
VariablePRelative hazard ratio ± SEConfidence interval
 <.001   
Clofarabine treatment .037 0.83 ± 0.08 0.69-0.99 
Age <.001 1.03 ± 0.0 1.02-1.03 
White blood cell count <.001 1.17 ± 0.04 1.10-1.25 
ELN intermediate risk I <.001 2.10 ± 0.30 1.59-2.78 
ELN intermediate risk II <.001 1.95 ± 0.30 1.45-2.63 
ELN adverse risk <.001 3.99 ± 060 2.97-5.35 
Secondary AML .0072 1.49 ± 0.22 1.11-1.98 
Treatment-related AML .91 1.02 ± 022 0.68-1.55 

Result for the multivariable Cox regression for EFS. The following covariates were considered: patient age, white blood cell count at diagnosis (log transformation), ELN risk category 2010 (values expressed in relation to ELN favorable),12  secondary and treatment-related AML (in relation to AML de novo). ELN risk 2010 defined according to Döhner et al12  but slightly modified for bi-allelic CEBPA gene mutations, as detailed in the supplemental Appendix.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal