Table 1.

Patient characteristics at baseline according randomization

Control induction treatmentClofarabine induction treatmentNo. of cases evaluated
Total 402 (100%) 393 (100%)  
Sex, male 215 (53%) 229 (58%)  
Age, y 
 Median (range)* 54 (18-65) 56 (18-66)  
 ≤45 108 (27%) 112 (28%)  
 46-60 195 (49%) 166 (42%)  
 61-65 99 (25%) 115 (29%)  
Performance status 
 WHO 0 206 (51%) 178 (45%)  
 WHO 1 152 (38%) 170 (43%)  
 WHO 2 29 (7%) 28 (7%)  
 Unknown 15 (4%) 17 (4%)  
AML type 
 De novo 346 (86%) 341 (87%)  
 sAML 35 (9%) 33 (8%)  
 tAML 21 (5%) 19 (5%)  
High-risk RAEB 42 (10%) 38 (10%)  
First-degree relatives with AML 9 (2%) 7 (2%)  
Family history unknown 51 (13%) 49 (12%)  
WBC at diagnosis [×109/L] 
 ≤20 282 (70%) 281 (72%)  
 20-100 94 (23%) 87 (22%)  
 >100 25 (6%) 24 (6%)  
Median (range) 6.4 (0.4-341) 7.3 (0.2-229)  
Blasts (%) in bone marrow (median) 51 51  
Cytogenetics    
 t(8;21)* 24 (6%) 21 (5%)  
 inv(16) 14 (3%) 15 (4%)  
 CN X-Y 208 (52%) 184 (47%)  
 CA rest 94 (23%) 105 (27%) 
 Monosomal karyotype 53 (13%) 52 (13%) 
 Unknown 9 (2%) 16 (4%) 
Gene mutations    
NPM1 116 (31%) 95 (25%) 754 
FLT3-ITD 68 (19%) 71 (20%) 704 
FLT3-TKD835 24 (7%) 24 (7%) 653 
NPM1 mut-FLT3-ITD neg 69 (20%) 50 (14%) 696 
NPM1 mut-FLT3-ITD 35 (10%) 39 (11%)  
NPM1wt-FLT3-ITD neg 209 (60%) 229 (65%)  
NPM1wt-FLT3-ITD 33 (10%) 32 (9%)  
DNMT3A mutation 82 (27%) 85 (27%) 609 
IDH1 mutation 28 (9%) 34 (11%) 609 
IDH2 mutation 34 (11%) 36 (12%) 609 
TET2 mutation 34 (11%) 41 (13%) 609 
 Bi-allelic CEBPA mutations 12 (4%) 14 (5%) 573 
RUNX1 mutation 40 (13%) 40 (13%) 609 
ASXL1 mutation 31 (10%) 32 (10%) 609 
P53 mutation 28 (9%) 29 (9%) 609 
SF3B1 mutation 9 (3%) 4 (1%) 609 
SRSF2 mutation 24 (8%) 31 (10%) 609 
PTPN11 mutation 33 (11%) 36 (12%) 609 
KRAS mutation 19 (6%) 21 (7%) 609 
NRAS mutation 59 (20%) 70 (23%) 609 
MLL-PTD 16 (7%) 13 (5%) 490 
JAK2 7 (2%) 8 (3%) 609 
 EVI-1 overexpression 36 (11%) 46 (14%) 641 
Prognostic risk according to ELN criteria 2010    
 Favorable 104 (26%) 85 (22%)  
 Intermediate I 121 (30%) 123 (31%)  
 Intermediate II 88 (22%) 99 (25%)  
 Adverse 89 (22%) 86 (22%)  
Control induction treatmentClofarabine induction treatmentNo. of cases evaluated
Total 402 (100%) 393 (100%)  
Sex, male 215 (53%) 229 (58%)  
Age, y 
 Median (range)* 54 (18-65) 56 (18-66)  
 ≤45 108 (27%) 112 (28%)  
 46-60 195 (49%) 166 (42%)  
 61-65 99 (25%) 115 (29%)  
Performance status 
 WHO 0 206 (51%) 178 (45%)  
 WHO 1 152 (38%) 170 (43%)  
 WHO 2 29 (7%) 28 (7%)  
 Unknown 15 (4%) 17 (4%)  
AML type 
 De novo 346 (86%) 341 (87%)  
 sAML 35 (9%) 33 (8%)  
 tAML 21 (5%) 19 (5%)  
High-risk RAEB 42 (10%) 38 (10%)  
First-degree relatives with AML 9 (2%) 7 (2%)  
Family history unknown 51 (13%) 49 (12%)  
WBC at diagnosis [×109/L] 
 ≤20 282 (70%) 281 (72%)  
 20-100 94 (23%) 87 (22%)  
 >100 25 (6%) 24 (6%)  
Median (range) 6.4 (0.4-341) 7.3 (0.2-229)  
Blasts (%) in bone marrow (median) 51 51  
Cytogenetics    
 t(8;21)* 24 (6%) 21 (5%)  
 inv(16) 14 (3%) 15 (4%)  
 CN X-Y 208 (52%) 184 (47%)  
 CA rest 94 (23%) 105 (27%) 
 Monosomal karyotype 53 (13%) 52 (13%) 
 Unknown 9 (2%) 16 (4%) 
Gene mutations    
NPM1 116 (31%) 95 (25%) 754 
FLT3-ITD 68 (19%) 71 (20%) 704 
FLT3-TKD835 24 (7%) 24 (7%) 653 
NPM1 mut-FLT3-ITD neg 69 (20%) 50 (14%) 696 
NPM1 mut-FLT3-ITD 35 (10%) 39 (11%)  
NPM1wt-FLT3-ITD neg 209 (60%) 229 (65%)  
NPM1wt-FLT3-ITD 33 (10%) 32 (9%)  
DNMT3A mutation 82 (27%) 85 (27%) 609 
IDH1 mutation 28 (9%) 34 (11%) 609 
IDH2 mutation 34 (11%) 36 (12%) 609 
TET2 mutation 34 (11%) 41 (13%) 609 
 Bi-allelic CEBPA mutations 12 (4%) 14 (5%) 573 
RUNX1 mutation 40 (13%) 40 (13%) 609 
ASXL1 mutation 31 (10%) 32 (10%) 609 
P53 mutation 28 (9%) 29 (9%) 609 
SF3B1 mutation 9 (3%) 4 (1%) 609 
SRSF2 mutation 24 (8%) 31 (10%) 609 
PTPN11 mutation 33 (11%) 36 (12%) 609 
KRAS mutation 19 (6%) 21 (7%) 609 
NRAS mutation 59 (20%) 70 (23%) 609 
MLL-PTD 16 (7%) 13 (5%) 490 
JAK2 7 (2%) 8 (3%) 609 
 EVI-1 overexpression 36 (11%) 46 (14%) 641 
Prognostic risk according to ELN criteria 2010    
 Favorable 104 (26%) 85 (22%)  
 Intermediate I 121 (30%) 123 (31%)  
 Intermediate II 88 (22%) 99 (25%)  
 Adverse 89 (22%) 86 (22%)  

N refers to number of patients. Gene mutations are as follows: NPM1 nuclephosmin-1; FLT3, fms-like tyrosine kinase-3; FLT3-TKD835, FLT3 gene with point mutation at position D835; DNMT3A, DNA methyltransferase 3A; IDH1/IDH2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2; TET2, Ten-Eleven translocation-2; CEPBA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α; RUNX1, runt-related transcription factor 1; ASXL1, additional sex combs like 1; p53; SF3B1, splicing factor 3B subunit; SRSF2, serine and arginine rich splicing factor 2; PTPN11, protein tyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 11; MLL, myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia; JAK2, Janus kinase 2. RAEB with an international prognostic score of ≥1.5 IPSS is as described previously. The ELN prognostic risk categories are as described by Döhner et al.12 

CA, abnormal cytogenetics; CN, normal cytogenetics; EVI1, ecotropic virus integration 1 gene; FLT3-ITD negative, FLT3 without internal tandem duplications; ITD, internal tandem duplication; mut, mutation; neg, negative; PTD, partial tandem duplication; sAML, secondary AML (after myelodysplastic syndrome and antecedent hematological disease); tAML, therapy-related AML (in case of prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. For details, see the Methods section); WBC, white blood cell count at diagnosis; WHO, World Health Organization.

*

AML with core-binding factor abnormalities: t(8;21) (q22;q22), inv(16)(p13.1;q22), or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) Monosomal karyotype is defined as described by Breems et al.13 

According to Döhner et al12  but slightly modified for bi-allelic CEBPA gene mutations, as detailed in the supplemental Appendix.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal