Table 1.

Clinical and biological characteristics of patients with AML

VariableValue
Sex, n (%)  
 Male 26 (52) 
 Female 24 (48) 
Age at diagnosis, y (%)  
 <50 15 (30) 
 ≥50 35 (70) 
Median, y 56 
Range, y 21-69 
Peripheral blood white cell count  
 <30 000/mm3, n (%) 29 (58) 
 ≥30 000/mm3, n (%) 21 (42) 
 Median (109 cells/L) 23.6 
 Range (109 cells/L) 0.4-385 
Circulating blasts, %  
 Median 32 
 Range 0-99 
Bone marrow blasts, %  
 Median 60 
 Range 23-96 
Diagnosis, n (%)  
 De novo AML 41 (82) 
 Secondary AML (MDS-related) 7 (14) 
 Secondary AML (therapy-related) 2 (4) 
FAB classification, n (%)  
 M0 1 (2) 
 M1 14 (28) 
 M2 15 (30) 
 M4 11 (22) 
 M5 5 (10) 
 M6 2 (4) 
 MDS RAEB-T 2 (4) 
Cytogenetic profile,* n (%)  
 Favorable 4 (8) 
 Intermediate 34 (68) 
 Unfavorable 8 (16) 
 Missing data 4 (8) 
Molecular features, n (%)  
 NPM1 mutation 19 (38) 
 FLT3/ITD translocation 14 (28) 
 MLL mutation 4 (8) 
 RUNX1/RUNX1T1 translocation 3 (6) 
 CEBPA mutation 2 (4) 
 CBFB/MYH11 translocation 1 (2) 
Induction chemotherapy, n (%)  
 Daunorubicine 90 mg/m2 3 d + Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 7 d 35 (70) 
 Idarubicine 10 mg/m2 3 d + Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 7 d 14 (28) 
 Fludarabine 15 mg/m2 + Cytarabine 500 mg/m2 twice-daily 4 d 1 (2) 
Consolidation therapy, n (%)  
 Chemotherapy only 34 (68) 
 Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 28 (56) 
Treatment response, n (%)  
 Complete remission 38 (76) 
  After 1 induction cycle 29 (58) 
  After 2 induction cycles 9 (18) 
 Induction failure 11 (22) 
 Death in aplasia 1 (2) 
VariableValue
Sex, n (%)  
 Male 26 (52) 
 Female 24 (48) 
Age at diagnosis, y (%)  
 <50 15 (30) 
 ≥50 35 (70) 
Median, y 56 
Range, y 21-69 
Peripheral blood white cell count  
 <30 000/mm3, n (%) 29 (58) 
 ≥30 000/mm3, n (%) 21 (42) 
 Median (109 cells/L) 23.6 
 Range (109 cells/L) 0.4-385 
Circulating blasts, %  
 Median 32 
 Range 0-99 
Bone marrow blasts, %  
 Median 60 
 Range 23-96 
Diagnosis, n (%)  
 De novo AML 41 (82) 
 Secondary AML (MDS-related) 7 (14) 
 Secondary AML (therapy-related) 2 (4) 
FAB classification, n (%)  
 M0 1 (2) 
 M1 14 (28) 
 M2 15 (30) 
 M4 11 (22) 
 M5 5 (10) 
 M6 2 (4) 
 MDS RAEB-T 2 (4) 
Cytogenetic profile,* n (%)  
 Favorable 4 (8) 
 Intermediate 34 (68) 
 Unfavorable 8 (16) 
 Missing data 4 (8) 
Molecular features, n (%)  
 NPM1 mutation 19 (38) 
 FLT3/ITD translocation 14 (28) 
 MLL mutation 4 (8) 
 RUNX1/RUNX1T1 translocation 3 (6) 
 CEBPA mutation 2 (4) 
 CBFB/MYH11 translocation 1 (2) 
Induction chemotherapy, n (%)  
 Daunorubicine 90 mg/m2 3 d + Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 7 d 35 (70) 
 Idarubicine 10 mg/m2 3 d + Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 7 d 14 (28) 
 Fludarabine 15 mg/m2 + Cytarabine 500 mg/m2 twice-daily 4 d 1 (2) 
Consolidation therapy, n (%)  
 Chemotherapy only 34 (68) 
 Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 28 (56) 
Treatment response, n (%)  
 Complete remission 38 (76) 
  After 1 induction cycle 29 (58) 
  After 2 induction cycles 9 (18) 
 Induction failure 11 (22) 
 Death in aplasia 1 (2) 

CBFB, core binding factor β; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alfa; FAB, Franco-Americano-British; FLT3, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3; ITD, internal tandem duplication; MLL, mixed-lineage leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MYH11, myosin heavy chain 11; NPM1, nucleophosmin 1; RAEB-T, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation; RUNX1, runt-related transcription factor 1; RUNX1T1, RUNX1 translocation partner 1.

*

Per Grimwade et al.40 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal