Computer modeling accurately predicts STAT3 protein t1/2 in EBV cells generated from 8 of 8 AD-HIES patients
Mutation category . | Genotype (N)* . | Stability prediction (stable = 0; unstable = 2) . | Measured t1/2 ± SD (h) . |
---|---|---|---|
None | wt/wt (N = 8) | Stable (0) | 25 ± 2 |
Functional | R382W/wt (N = 4) | Stable (0.4) | 25.5 ± 3.3 |
Structural | V463del/wt (N = 6) | Destabilizing (1) | 6.8 ± 4.8† |
Y657S/wt (N = 6) | Significantly destabilizing (1.8) | 5.5 ± 4.1† | |
T622I/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (0.6) | 18 ± 5.8‡ | |
Structural-functional | R423Q/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (0.6) | 20 ± 2.3‡ |
S611N/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (1.4) | 7 ± 3.6† | |
N647D/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (0.8) | 18.5 ± 3‡ | |
V637M/wt (N=4) | Destabilizing (1) | 5.3 ± 4.5† |
Mutation category . | Genotype (N)* . | Stability prediction (stable = 0; unstable = 2) . | Measured t1/2 ± SD (h) . |
---|---|---|---|
None | wt/wt (N = 8) | Stable (0) | 25 ± 2 |
Functional | R382W/wt (N = 4) | Stable (0.4) | 25.5 ± 3.3 |
Structural | V463del/wt (N = 6) | Destabilizing (1) | 6.8 ± 4.8† |
Y657S/wt (N = 6) | Significantly destabilizing (1.8) | 5.5 ± 4.1† | |
T622I/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (0.6) | 18 ± 5.8‡ | |
Structural-functional | R423Q/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (0.6) | 20 ± 2.3‡ |
S611N/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (1.4) | 7 ± 3.6† | |
N647D/wt (N = 4) | Destabilizing (0.8) | 18.5 ± 3‡ | |
V637M/wt (N=4) | Destabilizing (1) | 5.3 ± 4.5† |