Table 2

Long-term clonal evolution upon lenalidomide treatment in low/int-1 myelodysplastic syndromes

Patient characteristics at baselineLong-term evolution
UPNGender/age, yWHOIPSSMutated genesTreatmentLast follow-up, moCycle of treatmentMajor mutationsMinor mutation(s)Clinical status
13 M/62 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, TET2, DNMT3A, TET2 Lenalidomide 23 C19 Re-increase Increase DNMT3A Loss of efficacy 
33 M/72 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1 Lenalidomide 12 C10 Re-increase Increase Loss of efficacy 
54 M/80 RCMD Int-1 DNMT3A, SF3B1 Lenalidomide 16 C10 Re-increase NA Loss of efficacy 
77 M/73 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 26 C21 Increase Decrease TET2 Loss of efficacy 
85 M/74 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, TET2, TET2, RUNX1 Lenalidomide + EPO 23 C20 Stable Decrease RUNX1 Still responder 
91 F/84 RCMD Low SF3B1, DNMT3A, SF3B1 Lenalidomide + EPO 22 C20 Decrease Increase SF3B1 ex 14 Still responder 
98 M/70 RAEB-1 Int-1 SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, EXH2, ETV6 Lenalidomide + EPO 18 C11 Re-increase Decrease TET2/increase EZH2 and ETV6 Transformation 
110 M/69 RARS Int-1 DMT3A, SF3B1, ETV6, TET2, JAK2 Lenalidomide 18 C14 Re-increase Increase JAK2 Loss of efficacy* 
101 M/76 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, SF3B1 Lenalidomide + EPO 18 C11 Re-increase Decrease SF3B1 Loss of efficacy 
124 M/80 RARS Low SF3B1, EZH2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 19 C16 Decrease Decrease TET2 and EZH2 Still responder 
130 M/74 RARS Low SF3B1, TET2, KIT Lenalidomide 10 C8 Re-increase Decrease TET2 and KIT Still responder 
17 M/72 RAEB-1 ND DNMT3A, SRSF2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO C7 Re-increase SRSF2 NA Transformation 
19 M/76 RARS Low SF3B1, TET2, TET2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 11 C8 Stable Stable Loss of efficacy 
35 F/46 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 18 C16 Re-increase SF3B1 NA Loss of efficacy 
39 M/63 RARS Int-1 DNMT3A, SF3B1 Lenalidomide 23 C28 Re-increase NA Loss of efficacy 
60 M/78 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 12 C5 Decrease NA Loss of efficacy 
76 M/65 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 20 C18 Re-increase Increase TET2 Loss of efficacy 
79 F/73 RCMD-RS Low SF3B1, TET2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 15 C12 Decrease Decrease TET2 Loss of efficacy 
Patient characteristics at baselineLong-term evolution
UPNGender/age, yWHOIPSSMutated genesTreatmentLast follow-up, moCycle of treatmentMajor mutationsMinor mutation(s)Clinical status
13 M/62 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, TET2, DNMT3A, TET2 Lenalidomide 23 C19 Re-increase Increase DNMT3A Loss of efficacy 
33 M/72 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1 Lenalidomide 12 C10 Re-increase Increase Loss of efficacy 
54 M/80 RCMD Int-1 DNMT3A, SF3B1 Lenalidomide 16 C10 Re-increase NA Loss of efficacy 
77 M/73 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 26 C21 Increase Decrease TET2 Loss of efficacy 
85 M/74 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, TET2, TET2, RUNX1 Lenalidomide + EPO 23 C20 Stable Decrease RUNX1 Still responder 
91 F/84 RCMD Low SF3B1, DNMT3A, SF3B1 Lenalidomide + EPO 22 C20 Decrease Increase SF3B1 ex 14 Still responder 
98 M/70 RAEB-1 Int-1 SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, EXH2, ETV6 Lenalidomide + EPO 18 C11 Re-increase Decrease TET2/increase EZH2 and ETV6 Transformation 
110 M/69 RARS Int-1 DMT3A, SF3B1, ETV6, TET2, JAK2 Lenalidomide 18 C14 Re-increase Increase JAK2 Loss of efficacy* 
101 M/76 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, SF3B1 Lenalidomide + EPO 18 C11 Re-increase Decrease SF3B1 Loss of efficacy 
124 M/80 RARS Low SF3B1, EZH2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 19 C16 Decrease Decrease TET2 and EZH2 Still responder 
130 M/74 RARS Low SF3B1, TET2, KIT Lenalidomide 10 C8 Re-increase Decrease TET2 and KIT Still responder 
17 M/72 RAEB-1 ND DNMT3A, SRSF2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO C7 Re-increase SRSF2 NA Transformation 
19 M/76 RARS Low SF3B1, TET2, TET2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 11 C8 Stable Stable Loss of efficacy 
35 F/46 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 18 C16 Re-increase SF3B1 NA Loss of efficacy 
39 M/63 RARS Int-1 DNMT3A, SF3B1 Lenalidomide 23 C28 Re-increase NA Loss of efficacy 
60 M/78 RCMD Int-1 SF3B1, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 12 C5 Decrease NA Loss of efficacy 
76 M/65 RARS Int-1 SF3B1, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 20 C18 Re-increase Increase TET2 Loss of efficacy 
79 F/73 RCMD-RS Low SF3B1, TET2, TET2 Lenalidomide + EPO 15 C12 Decrease Decrease TET2 Loss of efficacy 

Targeted sequencing was performed before treatment and after >5 cycles of treatment in 18 patients. Major mutations are indicated in bold. For the last follow-up, number of treatment cycles is indicated. Based on the statistical analyses, evolution of major and minor mutations is expressed as increase, decrease, or stable. When major mutations initially decreased after 4 cycles of treatment and increased during long-term follow-up, the evolution of major mutations is indicated as re-increase.

C, treatment cycle; F, female; M, male; NA, not applicable; ND, not determined.

*

Severe adverse event (neuropathy).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal