Table 1

Discordant indolent BMI in patients with DLBCL

Reference# of patients with any lymphomatous BMI (%)# of patients with discordant BMI (%)TreatmentPrognostic significance of discordant vs concordant disease
25 22 (28%) 11 (14%) CHOP, CVP, M-BACOD, and MACOP-B 2 y OS of 36% in discordant disease vs 11% in concordant disease 
43 (29%)* 21 (14%)* Chlorambucil/vincristine/prednisone, or CAP-BOP Superior OS with discordant disease compared with concordant disease (P = .05) 
22 50 (N/A) 19 (N/A) Anthracycline-based regimens 5 y OS of 79% with discordant disease vs 12% with concordant disease (P = .002) 
19 20 (34%) 14 (24%) proMACE/MOPP, proMACE/cytaBOM, CHOP, CVP, M-BACOD, and COMLA Mean OS of 47.7 mo in discordant disease vs 13.1 mo in concordant disease (P < .05) 
23 N/A 21 (N/A) Unknown chemotherapy regimens ± radiation therapy Not assessed 
32 72 (16%) 18 (4%) Not described Not assessed 
20 47 (27%) 34 (20%) CHOP or CHOP-like regimens Superior PFS and OS with discordant disease compared with concordant disease (P = .055 and .05, respectively) 
55 (11%) 26 (5%) CHOP or CHOP-like regimens 5 y OS of 62% with discordant disease vs 10% with concordant disease (multivariate P = .002) 
125 (16%) 58 (7%) R-CHOP 3 y PFS of 56% in discordant disease vs 37% in concordant disease (multivariate P < .001); 3 y OS of 69% in discordant disease vs 49% in concordant disease (multivariate P = .007) 
21 80 (13%) 32 (5%) R-CHOP 3 y PFS of 57% in discordant disease vs 30% in concordant disease (multivariate P < .001); 3 y OS of 64% in discordant disease vs 39% in concordant disease (multivariate P = .011) 
Reference# of patients with any lymphomatous BMI (%)# of patients with discordant BMI (%)TreatmentPrognostic significance of discordant vs concordant disease
25 22 (28%) 11 (14%) CHOP, CVP, M-BACOD, and MACOP-B 2 y OS of 36% in discordant disease vs 11% in concordant disease 
43 (29%)* 21 (14%)* Chlorambucil/vincristine/prednisone, or CAP-BOP Superior OS with discordant disease compared with concordant disease (P = .05) 
22 50 (N/A) 19 (N/A) Anthracycline-based regimens 5 y OS of 79% with discordant disease vs 12% with concordant disease (P = .002) 
19 20 (34%) 14 (24%) proMACE/MOPP, proMACE/cytaBOM, CHOP, CVP, M-BACOD, and COMLA Mean OS of 47.7 mo in discordant disease vs 13.1 mo in concordant disease (P < .05) 
23 N/A 21 (N/A) Unknown chemotherapy regimens ± radiation therapy Not assessed 
32 72 (16%) 18 (4%) Not described Not assessed 
20 47 (27%) 34 (20%) CHOP or CHOP-like regimens Superior PFS and OS with discordant disease compared with concordant disease (P = .055 and .05, respectively) 
55 (11%) 26 (5%) CHOP or CHOP-like regimens 5 y OS of 62% with discordant disease vs 10% with concordant disease (multivariate P = .002) 
125 (16%) 58 (7%) R-CHOP 3 y PFS of 56% in discordant disease vs 37% in concordant disease (multivariate P < .001); 3 y OS of 69% in discordant disease vs 49% in concordant disease (multivariate P = .007) 
21 80 (13%) 32 (5%) R-CHOP 3 y PFS of 57% in discordant disease vs 30% in concordant disease (multivariate P < .001); 3 y OS of 64% in discordant disease vs 39% in concordant disease (multivariate P = .011) 

CAP-BOP, cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-procarbazine-bleomycin-vincristine-prednisone; COMLA, cyclophosphamide-vincristine-methotrexate-cytosine-arabinoside-leucovorin; CVP, cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone; M-BACOD, methotrexate-bleomycin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-dexamethasone; MACOP-B, methotrexate-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone-bleomycin; N/A, not applicable or data not reported; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; proMACE/CytaBOM, cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide-cytarabine-bleomycin-vincristine-methotrexate-leucovorin-trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; proMACE/MOPP, prednisone-methotrexate-leucovorin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-etoposide.

*

For LN histology both DLBCL and immunoblastic lymphoma were included.

Result controlled for IPI.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal