Table 2

Comparison of outcomes between the 2 arms

HD-DXM (n = 95)PDN (n = 97)POR95% CI
Overall response, n (%) 78 (82.1) 67 (69.1) .044 2.054 1.042-4.050 
CR, n (%) 48 (50.5) 26 (26.8) .001 2.789 1.526-5.097 
Median TTR, d (range) 3 (1-9) 6 (2-24) <.001   
SR, n (%) 38 (40.0) 40 (41.2) .884 0.950 0.534-1.690 
Sustained CR, n (%) 26 (27.4) 17 (17.5) .120 1.773 0.889-3.539 
Additional therapy*, n      
 HD-MP    
 IVIg 15 14    
 Splenectomy    
 Rituximab 12 11    
 Rh-TPO    
 Vincristine    
 Ciclosporin    
 Azathioprine    
 Herbs    
HD-DXM (n = 95)PDN (n = 97)POR95% CI
Overall response, n (%) 78 (82.1) 67 (69.1) .044 2.054 1.042-4.050 
CR, n (%) 48 (50.5) 26 (26.8) .001 2.789 1.526-5.097 
Median TTR, d (range) 3 (1-9) 6 (2-24) <.001   
SR, n (%) 38 (40.0) 40 (41.2) .884 0.950 0.534-1.690 
Sustained CR, n (%) 26 (27.4) 17 (17.5) .120 1.773 0.889-3.539 
Additional therapy*, n      
 HD-MP    
 IVIg 15 14    
 Splenectomy    
 Rituximab 12 11    
 Rh-TPO    
 Vincristine    
 Ciclosporin    
 Azathioprine    
 Herbs    

IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; PDN, prednisone; Rh-TPO, recombinant human thrombopoietin; TTR, time to response.

*

These data included ITP-modifying additional therapy administered to initial nonresponders and patients who failed to achieve sustained response.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal