Table 2

Clinical significance of posttreatment MRD analysis as determined by a method with sensitivity of at least 10−4, after first-line combination chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy

StudyTreatmentNo. of patients with MRD testing, (% MRD negative)MRD threshold, sample source, methodPFSP valueOverall survivalP value
Bosch et al 2008 FCM 18 (41%) 10−4, FLC BM MRD-positive CR < MRD-negative CR .2 Not reported NA 
Lamanna et al 200943  F→C→R 23 (52%) Nested ASO IGHV PCR 10−5 35 months vs NR .007 Not reported NA 
Maloum et al 200944  FC 21 (64%) 10−4, FLC PB DFS, median/HR not reported <.001 No difference NS 
Bottcher et al 201210  FC or FCR 290* 10−2 and 10−4, FLC PB 15, 41, and 69 months for ≥10−2, ≥10−4 to <10−2, and <10−4, respectively <.001 Significantly inferior for ≥10−2 vs <10−2 <.001 
Fischer et al 201246  BR 45 (58%) 10−2 and 10−4, FLC PB 12 months, 32 months, and NR for ≥10−2, ≥10−4 to <10−2, and <10−4, respectively <.001 23.2 months for ≥10−2 vs NR for <10−2 Not reported 
Abrisqueta et al 201347  R+FCM 63 (56%) 10−4, FLC BM 4 years; 86% vs 60% .03 Not reported Not reported 
Strati et al 201448  FCR 161 (43%) 10−4, FLC BM HR 0.1 (median NR) .03 HR 0.6 (median NR) .02 
Goede et al 201415  Obinutuzumab + Clb 133 (20%) in BM, 231 (38%) in PB 10−4, FLC PB/BM 19.4 months vs NR <.001 Not reported NA 
Kwok et al 201445  Predominantly F-based combinations 57 first-line (42%) 10−4, FLC BM 5 years; 81% vs 16% <.001 10 years; 53% vs 24% <.001 
StudyTreatmentNo. of patients with MRD testing, (% MRD negative)MRD threshold, sample source, methodPFSP valueOverall survivalP value
Bosch et al 2008 FCM 18 (41%) 10−4, FLC BM MRD-positive CR < MRD-negative CR .2 Not reported NA 
Lamanna et al 200943  F→C→R 23 (52%) Nested ASO IGHV PCR 10−5 35 months vs NR .007 Not reported NA 
Maloum et al 200944  FC 21 (64%) 10−4, FLC PB DFS, median/HR not reported <.001 No difference NS 
Bottcher et al 201210  FC or FCR 290* 10−2 and 10−4, FLC PB 15, 41, and 69 months for ≥10−2, ≥10−4 to <10−2, and <10−4, respectively <.001 Significantly inferior for ≥10−2 vs <10−2 <.001 
Fischer et al 201246  BR 45 (58%) 10−2 and 10−4, FLC PB 12 months, 32 months, and NR for ≥10−2, ≥10−4 to <10−2, and <10−4, respectively <.001 23.2 months for ≥10−2 vs NR for <10−2 Not reported 
Abrisqueta et al 201347  R+FCM 63 (56%) 10−4, FLC BM 4 years; 86% vs 60% .03 Not reported Not reported 
Strati et al 201448  FCR 161 (43%) 10−4, FLC BM HR 0.1 (median NR) .03 HR 0.6 (median NR) .02 
Goede et al 201415  Obinutuzumab + Clb 133 (20%) in BM, 231 (38%) in PB 10−4, FLC PB/BM 19.4 months vs NR <.001 Not reported NA 
Kwok et al 201445  Predominantly F-based combinations 57 first-line (42%) 10−4, FLC BM 5 years; 81% vs 16% <.001 10 years; 53% vs 24% <.001 

BR, bendamustine and rituximab; Clb, chlorambucil; DFS, disease-free survival; F, fludarabine; FCM, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone; F→C→R, sequential fludarabine, high-dose cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; PB, peripheral blood.

*

Patients with end-of-treatment flow cytometry results only.

Significance of intermediate MRD (10−2-10−4) was dependent on the site of assessment; patients with intermediate MRD level in PB had an inferior outcome to those with this level of MRD in marrow only (although numbers were small).

MRD showed prognostic significance independent of clinical response and baseline prognostic features.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal