Table 3

Comparison of VWF phenotypes between individual assay components

Individual VWF activity test and variant VWD phenotype ratio comparisonP
VWF:GPIbM ratio [VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 1C <.001 
 Type 1 ↓ ratio than type 2B <.001 
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 2B <.001 
VWF:FVIIIB ratio [VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2N and 2N carriers ↓ ratio than HA (mild or carriers) <.001 
VWF:CB3 ratio [VWF:CB3/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:CB3/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 1C <.001 
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 2M <.001 
VWFpp ratio [VWFpp/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWFpp/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 1C .002 
 Type 1 ↓ ratio than type 1C <.001 
VWF:Ag ratio [VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 1C ↓ ratio than type 2A <.001 
Individual VWF activity test and variant VWD phenotype ratio comparisonP
VWF:GPIbM ratio [VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 1C <.001 
 Type 1 ↓ ratio than type 2B <.001 
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 2B <.001 
VWF:FVIIIB ratio [VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2N and 2N carriers ↓ ratio than HA (mild or carriers) <.001 
VWF:CB3 ratio [VWF:CB3/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:CB3/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 1C <.001 
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 2M <.001 
VWFpp ratio [VWFpp/VWF:Ag]subject/[VWFpp/VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 2A ↓ ratio than type 1C .002 
 Type 1 ↓ ratio than type 1C <.001 
VWF:Ag ratio [VWF:Ag]subject/[VWF:Ag]standard  
 Type 1C ↓ ratio than type 2A <.001 

The ratio of each VWF activity test to VWF:Ag was evaluated for the ability to discriminate between VWF phenotypes.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal