Table 2

Landmark analysis after 3 months and 6 months

Three-month landmarkTreatment change after 3 moFFS after 3 moNRM after 3 moOS after 3 mo
NIH calculated (2005) P = .37 P = .49 P = .55 P = .51 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD 
NIH calculated (2014) HR 0.50 (0.30-0.80) HR 0.60 (0.41-0.89) P = .32 P = .59 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .003 P = .01 
Clinician reported HR 0.28 (0.18-0.47) HR 0.34 (0.22-0.52) P = .84 P = .47 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P < .001 P < .001 
Patient-reported improvement (I) vs stable (S) vs worsening (W) Overall P < .001 Overall P < .001 P = .62 P = .36 
 I vs S HR 0.41 (0.24-0.74), P = .002 HR 0.43 (0.27-0.70), P < .001 
 S vs W HR 0.24 (0.10-0.69), P = .003 HR 0.25 (0.11-0.63), P = .001 
Three-month landmarkTreatment change after 3 moFFS after 3 moNRM after 3 moOS after 3 mo
NIH calculated (2005) P = .37 P = .49 P = .55 P = .51 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD 
NIH calculated (2014) HR 0.50 (0.30-0.80) HR 0.60 (0.41-0.89) P = .32 P = .59 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .003 P = .01 
Clinician reported HR 0.28 (0.18-0.47) HR 0.34 (0.22-0.52) P = .84 P = .47 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P < .001 P < .001 
Patient-reported improvement (I) vs stable (S) vs worsening (W) Overall P < .001 Overall P < .001 P = .62 P = .36 
 I vs S HR 0.41 (0.24-0.74), P = .002 HR 0.43 (0.27-0.70), P < .001 
 S vs W HR 0.24 (0.10-0.69), P = .003 HR 0.25 (0.11-0.63), P = .001 
Six-month landmarkTreatment change after 6 moFFS after 6 moNRM after 6 moOS after 6 mo
NIH calculated (2005) HR 0.61 (0.40-0.90) P = .06 P = .24 P = .06 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .01 
NIH calculated (2014) HR 0.56 (0.37-0.83) HR 0.58 (0.42-0.80) P = .28 P = .20 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .003 P = .001 
Clinician reported HR 0.53 (0.36-0.81) HR 0.61 (0.44-0.85) P = .06 HR 0.55 (0.36-0.85) 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .004 P = .004 P = .007 
Patient-reported improvement vs stable vs worsening P = .13 P = .08 P = .33 P = .44 
Six-month landmarkTreatment change after 6 moFFS after 6 moNRM after 6 moOS after 6 mo
NIH calculated (2005) HR 0.61 (0.40-0.90) P = .06 P = .24 P = .06 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .01 
NIH calculated (2014) HR 0.56 (0.37-0.83) HR 0.58 (0.42-0.80) P = .28 P = .20 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .003 P = .001 
Clinician reported HR 0.53 (0.36-0.81) HR 0.61 (0.44-0.85) P = .06 HR 0.55 (0.36-0.85) 
 CR + PR vs SD + PD P = .004 P = .004 P = .007 
Patient-reported improvement vs stable vs worsening P = .13 P = .08 P = .33 P = .44 

HR, hazard ratio.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal