Table 3

Univariate analysis (life tables and log-rank test) of the difference between OS and PFS according to dichotomized baseline PET parameters and the presence of a bulky lesion

Parameter5-y OS (95% CI)P5-y PFS (95% CI)P
SUVmax  .0025  .0065 
 Low 99% (91%-99.8%)  93% (84%-97%)  
 High 83% (64%-93%)  73% (54%-86%)  
MTV  .0036  <.0001 
 Low 100% (n.a.%)  95% (88%-98%)  
 High 86% (72%-94%)  55% (31%-73%)  
TLG  .0001  <.0001 
 Low 100% (n.a.%)  99% (90%-99.8%)  
 High 80% (62%-91%)  64% (45%-77%)  
Bulky disease  .120  .013 
 <10 cm 98% (86%-99%)  96% (85%-99%)  
 ≥10 cm 91% (79%-96%)  80% (66%-88%)  
Parameter5-y OS (95% CI)P5-y PFS (95% CI)P
SUVmax  .0025  .0065 
 Low 99% (91%-99.8%)  93% (84%-97%)  
 High 83% (64%-93%)  73% (54%-86%)  
MTV  .0036  <.0001 
 Low 100% (n.a.%)  95% (88%-98%)  
 High 86% (72%-94%)  55% (31%-73%)  
TLG  .0001  <.0001 
 Low 100% (n.a.%)  99% (90%-99.8%)  
 High 80% (62%-91%)  64% (45%-77%)  
Bulky disease  .120  .013 
 <10 cm 98% (86%-99%)  96% (85%-99%)  
 ≥10 cm 91% (79%-96%)  80% (66%-88%)  

The presence of a bulky lesion was statistically significant only for PFS. All the remaining baseline clinical parameters, namely, gender, age, performance status, B-symptoms, LDH, stage, and the international prognostic indices, had no statistically significant impact on both OS and PFS and are not included in this table but are reported in the online appendices. Cutoff values used for the dichotomization of functional PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, TLG) are reported in Table 2.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal