Table 3

Initial treatment approaches and risk of transformation

FactorPatients, n (%)Overall confirmed transformation rate, %Confirmed transformation adjusted HR* (95% CIs)Overall confirmed or suspected transformation rate, %Confirmed or suspected transformation adjusted HR* (95% CIs)
Observed patients 555 (21) 7.6 17.8 
Treated patients 2097 (79) 6.2 0.57 (0.39-0.83) 13.4 0.58 (0.46-0.75) 
R-CVP 300 (11) 6.3 13.3 
R-CHOP 641 (24) 6.2 0.83 (0.46-1.50) 13.3 0.94 (0.62-1.42) 
Chemotherapy without rituximab 71 (3) 8.5 18.3 
Chemotherapy with rituximab 1284 (48) 6.5 0.82 (0.33-2.07) 13.4 0.61 (0.34-1.11) 
Observation 609 (23) 4.9 13.0 
Rituximab maintenance 529 (20) 4.5 0.87 (0.50-1.52) 9.2 0.67 (0.46-0.97) 
FactorPatients, n (%)Overall confirmed transformation rate, %Confirmed transformation adjusted HR* (95% CIs)Overall confirmed or suspected transformation rate, %Confirmed or suspected transformation adjusted HR* (95% CIs)
Observed patients 555 (21) 7.6 17.8 
Treated patients 2097 (79) 6.2 0.57 (0.39-0.83) 13.4 0.58 (0.46-0.75) 
R-CVP 300 (11) 6.3 13.3 
R-CHOP 641 (24) 6.2 0.83 (0.46-1.50) 13.3 0.94 (0.62-1.42) 
Chemotherapy without rituximab 71 (3) 8.5 18.3 
Chemotherapy with rituximab 1284 (48) 6.5 0.82 (0.33-2.07) 13.4 0.61 (0.34-1.11) 
Observation 609 (23) 4.9 13.0 
Rituximab maintenance 529 (20) 4.5 0.87 (0.50-1.52) 9.2 0.67 (0.46-0.97) 
*

Adjusted for age, stage, ECOG, B symptoms, nodal sites, extranodal sites, LDH, histologic grade, and hemoglobin. Rituximab maintenance comparison additionally adjusted for frontline treatment.

Patients with at least a response of stable disease to an initial rituximab-based regimen who were followed at least 215 days after the end of induction without experiencing progressive disease or starting a subsequent therapy within this time frame were included in analysis.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal