Table 2 Analysis of erythropoiesis... | American Society of Hematology

Table 2

Analysis of erythropoiesis according to iron status

Population	C, IB, %	C, ID, %	Statistics	Tfr2^BMKO IB, %	Tfr2^BMKO ID, %	Statistics
Ter119	16.08 ± 1.72	22.8 ± 1.47	*	22.97 ± 1.61	18.41 ± 1.57	NS
I (proerythroblasts)	0.16 ± 0.02	0.17 ± 0.02	NS	0.29 ± 0.07	0.17 ± 0.03	NS
II (basophilic erythroblasts)	1.14 ± 0.06	2.97 ± 0.36	*	2.23 ± 0.21	2.37 ± 0.17	NS
III (polychromatic erythroblasts)	2.36 ± 0.12	5.34 ± 0.42	*	4.43 ± 0.61	4.47 ± 0.28	NS
IV (orthochromatic erythroblasts)	12.43 ± 1.53	14.33 ± 1.14	NS	16.03 ± 0.81	11.41 ± 1.48	NS

Population	C, IB, %	C, ID, %	Statistics	Tfr2^BMKO IB, %	Tfr2^BMKO ID, %	Statistics
Ter119	16.08 ± 1.72	22.8 ± 1.47	*	22.97 ± 1.61	18.41 ± 1.57	NS
I (proerythroblasts)	0.16 ± 0.02	0.17 ± 0.02	NS	0.29 ± 0.07	0.17 ± 0.03	NS
II (basophilic erythroblasts)	1.14 ± 0.06	2.97 ± 0.36	*	2.23 ± 0.21	2.37 ± 0.17	NS
III (polychromatic erythroblasts)	2.36 ± 0.12	5.34 ± 0.42	*	4.43 ± 0.61	4.47 ± 0.28	NS
IV (orthochromatic erythroblasts)	12.43 ± 1.53	14.33 ± 1.14	NS	16.03 ± 0.81	11.41 ± 1.48	NS

Mice were treated as indicated in Table 1. Gating strategy is reported in the legend of Table 1. Values are shown as mean ± SEM.

Asterisks refer to a statistically significant difference. *P < .05.