Table 2

Multivariate Cox regression analysis

ParameterP valueHR95% HR
Confidence limits
5hmC: <0.023 vs 0.023 to <0.070 .44 1.18 0.77 1.81 
5hmC: ≥0.070 vs 0.023 to <0.070 .01 2.10 1.16 3.80 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: good vs intermediate .21 0.60 0.25 1.36 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: others vs intermediate .17 1.44 0.86 2.39 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: poor vs intermediate <.0001 3.00 1.90 4.68 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: unknown vs intermediate .02 2.96 1.21 7.21 
ParameterP valueHR95% HR
Confidence limits
5hmC: <0.023 vs 0.023 to <0.070 .44 1.18 0.77 1.81 
5hmC: ≥0.070 vs 0.023 to <0.070 .01 2.10 1.16 3.80 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: good vs intermediate .21 0.60 0.25 1.36 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: others vs intermediate .17 1.44 0.86 2.39 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: poor vs intermediate <.0001 3.00 1.90 4.68 
Cytogenetics/FLT3-ITD: unknown vs intermediate .02 2.96 1.21 7.21 

Akaike information criterion for this model = 1238.

Addition of age, treatment arm (data not shown), and/or percentage BM blasts (supplemental Table 12) in the model did not improve its prognostic discrimination value. Considering 5hmC as a continuous variable in the model (linear and quadratic effect), and adjusting for cytogenetic/FLT3-ITD risk groups, provided similar results as the model indicated above (supplemental Table 12).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal