Table 1

Proposal as to which platforms are now ready for “prime time” according to AML disease subtype and clinical context

PlatformTiming of MRD assessmentApplicabilityComments
Early risk stratificationSequential MRD monitoring (longitudinal postconsolidation)
Flow cytometry *  >90% Ready to be used for assessing CR status 
MRD analysis needs to be conducted in expert laboratories with standardization 
RT-qPCR     
 Fusion genes/NPM1 mutation Marker-dependent * 32-62% Standardized assays for leukemia-specific targets available and widely validated 
WT1 expression §  ∼45% Assays insensitive and not leukemia-specific, but can predict outcome 
Next-generation sequencing   To be established Promising preliminary data 
Digital PCR   To be established Potentially applicable to detect mutations and fusion genes 
PlatformTiming of MRD assessmentApplicabilityComments
Early risk stratificationSequential MRD monitoring (longitudinal postconsolidation)
Flow cytometry *  >90% Ready to be used for assessing CR status 
MRD analysis needs to be conducted in expert laboratories with standardization 
RT-qPCR     
 Fusion genes/NPM1 mutation Marker-dependent * 32-62% Standardized assays for leukemia-specific targets available and widely validated 
WT1 expression §  ∼45% Assays insensitive and not leukemia-specific, but can predict outcome 
Next-generation sequencing   To be established Promising preliminary data 
Digital PCR   To be established Potentially applicable to detect mutations and fusion genes 
*

Validated in large studies within clinical trials.

Investigational.

Proportion of AML cases informative for a leukemia-specific molecular marker suitable for detection by RT-qPCR (ie, fusion gene, NPM1 mutation) varies according to age (see Figure 3).

§

Some supportive data, but not ready for “prime time.”

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal