Table 3

Univariate analysis of variables potentially associated with neutrophil engraftment in 128 myeloablative double-unit CBT recipients

VariableCategoryHR (95%CI)P
Recipient age (per decade) 0.90 (0.82-0.99) .03 
Disease type Myeloid Reference .15 
Lymphoid 1.31 (0.91-1.88) 
Recipient CMV serology Negative Reference .18 
Positive 1.27 (0.89-1.82) 
Conditioning regimen High-dose myeloablative Reference .49 
Reduced intensity* 1.13 (0.80-1.62) 
HLA allele match to recipient 8-9/10 Reference .98 
6-7/10 1.05 (0.66-1.67) 
2-5/10 1.02 (0.63-1.64) 
Reported by bank prefreeze TNC dose × 107/kg 1.19 (1.10-1.28) <.001 
CD34+ cell dose × 105/kg 1.39 (1.24-1.54) <.001 
Postthaw (infused) at MSKCC TNC dose × 107/kg 1.28 (1.16-1.41) <.001 
Viable CD34+ cell dose × 105/kg 1.88 (1.58-2.24) <.001 
CFU × 104/kg 1.08 (1.03-1.13) .001 
Viable CD3+ cell dose × 106/kg 1.09 (1.02-1.16) .006 
VariableCategoryHR (95%CI)P
Recipient age (per decade) 0.90 (0.82-0.99) .03 
Disease type Myeloid Reference .15 
Lymphoid 1.31 (0.91-1.88) 
Recipient CMV serology Negative Reference .18 
Positive 1.27 (0.89-1.82) 
Conditioning regimen High-dose myeloablative Reference .49 
Reduced intensity* 1.13 (0.80-1.62) 
HLA allele match to recipient 8-9/10 Reference .98 
6-7/10 1.05 (0.66-1.67) 
2-5/10 1.02 (0.63-1.64) 
Reported by bank prefreeze TNC dose × 107/kg 1.19 (1.10-1.28) <.001 
CD34+ cell dose × 105/kg 1.39 (1.24-1.54) <.001 
Postthaw (infused) at MSKCC TNC dose × 107/kg 1.28 (1.16-1.41) <.001 
Viable CD34+ cell dose × 105/kg 1.88 (1.58-2.24) <.001 
CFU × 104/kg 1.08 (1.03-1.13) .001 
Viable CD3+ cell dose × 106/kg 1.09 (1.02-1.16) .006 
*

Conditioning was functionally myeloablative.

Dominant unit.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal