Table 1

Presenting clinical and laboratory features of 826 Mayo Clinic patients with ET vs PV vs PMF

VariablesET, n = 292PV, n = 267PMF, n = 267P
ET vs PVET vs PMFPV vs PMF
Age, median (range), y 55 (15-91) 64 (19-95) 63 (14-87) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Age ≥60 y, n (%) 123 (42.1) 157 (58.8) 163 (61) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Females, n (%) 173 (59.2) 137 (51.3) 102 (38.2) .06 <.0001 .002 
Hemoglobin, median (range), g/dL 13.9 (6.9-17.9) 18.4 (15.1-24.5) 10.6 (5.8-16.1) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Leukocytes, median (range), ×109/L 9.6 (2.8-53.4) 11.8 (3.8-171.6) 8.6 (0.8-146.6) <.0001 .1 <.0001 
Platelets, median (range), ×109/L 1000 (454-3460) 467 (37-1720) 253 (12-2466) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Risk stratification,*%       
 Low 37 25 17 
 Intermediate 40 32  
 Intermediate-1   22 
 Intermediate-2   33 
 High 23 43 28 
Leukocytes, ≥11 × 109/L, % 33.1 56.5 36.3 <.0001 .4 <.0001 
Platelets, >1000 × 109/L, % 52.4 7.1 2.2 <.0001 <.0001 .008 
Abnormal karyotype, “N” evaluable = 610, n (%) 16 (7.7) 26 (18.3) 87 (33.4) .003 <.0001 .001 
Palpable splenomegaly, % 23.6 37.3 72.6 .0005 <.0001 <.0001 
Microcirculatory symptoms, “N” evaluable = 510, n (%) 52 (17.8) 89 (40.8) NA <.0001 NA NA 
Mutational status, n (%)    NA .02 NA 
 JAK2 157 (53.8) 149 (55.8) 
 CALR 89 (30.5) 64 (24) 
 MPL 8 (2.7) 21 (7.9) 
 Triple negative 38 (13) 33 (12.3) 
VariablesET, n = 292PV, n = 267PMF, n = 267P
ET vs PVET vs PMFPV vs PMF
Age, median (range), y 55 (15-91) 64 (19-95) 63 (14-87) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Age ≥60 y, n (%) 123 (42.1) 157 (58.8) 163 (61) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Females, n (%) 173 (59.2) 137 (51.3) 102 (38.2) .06 <.0001 .002 
Hemoglobin, median (range), g/dL 13.9 (6.9-17.9) 18.4 (15.1-24.5) 10.6 (5.8-16.1) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Leukocytes, median (range), ×109/L 9.6 (2.8-53.4) 11.8 (3.8-171.6) 8.6 (0.8-146.6) <.0001 .1 <.0001 
Platelets, median (range), ×109/L 1000 (454-3460) 467 (37-1720) 253 (12-2466) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Risk stratification,*%       
 Low 37 25 17 
 Intermediate 40 32  
 Intermediate-1   22 
 Intermediate-2   33 
 High 23 43 28 
Leukocytes, ≥11 × 109/L, % 33.1 56.5 36.3 <.0001 .4 <.0001 
Platelets, >1000 × 109/L, % 52.4 7.1 2.2 <.0001 <.0001 .008 
Abnormal karyotype, “N” evaluable = 610, n (%) 16 (7.7) 26 (18.3) 87 (33.4) .003 <.0001 .001 
Palpable splenomegaly, % 23.6 37.3 72.6 .0005 <.0001 <.0001 
Microcirculatory symptoms, “N” evaluable = 510, n (%) 52 (17.8) 89 (40.8) NA <.0001 NA NA 
Mutational status, n (%)    NA .02 NA 
 JAK2 157 (53.8) 149 (55.8) 
 CALR 89 (30.5) 64 (24) 
 MPL 8 (2.7) 21 (7.9) 
 Triple negative 38 (13) 33 (12.3) 

NA, not available.

*

Risk stratification in PMF was according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System plus; in ET, according to the International Prognostic Scoring System; and in PV, according to the International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment criteria. References for these prognostic criteria are included in the main text.