Table 1

Comparison of nonsynonymous mutations

GeneMutants observed
Present analysis, N = 133 myeloma tumor samplesPrevious study, N = 38 myeloma tumor samples
n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)
RAS/RAF* 61 45.9 (37-54.3) 20 52.6 (37-68.5) 
RAS* 58 43.6 (35-52.0) 19 50.0 (34-65.9) 
KRAS 32 24.1 (17-31.3) 10 26.3 (12-40.3) 
NRAS 26 19.5 (13-26.3) 23.7 (10-37.2) 
TP53 2.3 (0-4.8) 7.9 (0-16.5) 
BRAF 2.3 (0-4.8) 2.6 (0-7.7) 
PDGFRA 2.3 (0-4.8) 
JAK3 1.5 (0-3.6) 
EGFR 0.8 (0-2.2) 2.6 (0-7.7) 
APC 0.8 (0-2.2) 
CDKN2A 0.8 (0-2.2) 
CTNNB1 0.8 (0-2.2) 
FGFR3 0.8 (0-2.2) 
KIT 0.8 (0-2.2) 
PTEN 0.8 (0-2.2) 
STK11 0.8 (0-2.2) 
ERBB3 2.6 (0-7.7) 
FGFR2 2.6 (0-7.7) 
JAK2 2.6 (0-7.7) 
PTPN11 2.6 (0-7.7) 
RB1 2.6 (0-7.7) 
GeneMutants observed
Present analysis, N = 133 myeloma tumor samplesPrevious study, N = 38 myeloma tumor samples
n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)
RAS/RAF* 61 45.9 (37-54.3) 20 52.6 (37-68.5) 
RAS* 58 43.6 (35-52.0) 19 50.0 (34-65.9) 
KRAS 32 24.1 (17-31.3) 10 26.3 (12-40.3) 
NRAS 26 19.5 (13-26.3) 23.7 (10-37.2) 
TP53 2.3 (0-4.8) 7.9 (0-16.5) 
BRAF 2.3 (0-4.8) 2.6 (0-7.7) 
PDGFRA 2.3 (0-4.8) 
JAK3 1.5 (0-3.6) 
EGFR 0.8 (0-2.2) 2.6 (0-7.7) 
APC 0.8 (0-2.2) 
CDKN2A 0.8 (0-2.2) 
CTNNB1 0.8 (0-2.2) 
FGFR3 0.8 (0-2.2) 
KIT 0.8 (0-2.2) 
PTEN 0.8 (0-2.2) 
STK11 0.8 (0-2.2) 
ERBB3 2.6 (0-7.7) 
FGFR2 2.6 (0-7.7) 
JAK2 2.6 (0-7.7) 
PTPN11 2.6 (0-7.7) 
RB1 2.6 (0-7.7) 

Comparison of nonsynonymous mutations detected by Sequenom screening of 133 myeloma tumor samples in the present analysis, and in a previous study of 38 myeloma tumor samples.

*

RAS/RAF and RAS are aggregate categories including KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutants, and KRAS and NRAS mutants, respectively.

Mutants detected in the present study that were not reported in the previous study by Chapman et al and were absent and/or rarely observed in previous reports of myeloma tumor genetic profiling.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal