Table 1

Inhibitory activity of crenolanib against different FLT3 TKD mutations

Cell lineCrenolanibQuizartinibFold difference
IC50 pFLT3 (nM)IC50 pFLT3 (nM)
Ba/F3 ITD 1.3 1.7 1.2 
Ba/F3 ITD/D835Y 8.7 93.1 10.7 
Ba/F3 WT D835Y 6.9 33.7 4.9 
Ba/F3 WT D835F 6.5 72.7 11.2 
Ba/F3 WT D835H 19.8 20.0 — 
Ba/F3 WT D835N 4.3 2.3 0.5 
Ba/F3 WT D835V 2.3 63.7 27.4 
Ba/F3 ITD/F691L 67.8 36.4 0.5 
Cell lineCrenolanibQuizartinibFold difference
IC50 pFLT3 (nM)IC50 pFLT3 (nM)
Ba/F3 ITD 1.3 1.7 1.2 
Ba/F3 ITD/D835Y 8.7 93.1 10.7 
Ba/F3 WT D835Y 6.9 33.7 4.9 
Ba/F3 WT D835F 6.5 72.7 11.2 
Ba/F3 WT D835H 19.8 20.0 — 
Ba/F3 WT D835N 4.3 2.3 0.5 
Ba/F3 WT D835V 2.3 63.7 27.4 
Ba/F3 ITD/F691L 67.8 36.4 0.5 

Ba/F3 cell lines were treated with quizartinib or crenolanib for 1 hour and then cells were lysed, immunoprecipitated for FLT3, and analyzed by immunoblotting for phospho- and total FLT3. Densitometry analysis was performed using Quantity One software (version 4.5.0). IC50s were calculated by regression analysis after linear conversion (Calcusyn software).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal