Table 1

Characteristics of studies

SourceDesignParticipantsCentersAPLA testing
Tests doneCentral/localPositivity predefined (minimum number of occasions with positive test)Any follow-up on therapy
Bank, 2003 (Europe) RCT 64 ACLA (IgG and IgM) and LA* Central Yes (1) Yes (3 mo Idra in half of patients; 3 mo VKA in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff: not described 
Ginsberg, 1995 (N. America) Cohort 65 ACLA (IgG) and LA* 1 center Yes (1) Time on, and after, VKA analyzed separately 
ACLA cutoff: >3 SD above mean (30 GPL units) 
Kearon, 1999 (N. America) RCT 77 22 ACLA (IgG + IgM) and LA* Central Yes (1) No 
ACLA cutoff not described 
Kearon, 2004 (N. America) RCT 141 15 ACLA (IgG + IgM) and LA* Central Yes (1) Yes (2 mo VKA in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff not described 
Rodger, 2008 (N. America, Europe) Cohort 619 12 ACLA (IgG+ IgM)§ and LA Central No (1) No 
ACLA cutoff: 6 U/mL for men, 4 U/mL for women§ 
Wahlander, 2005 (N. and S. America, Europe, Africa) RCT 1041 142 ACLA only (IgG, IgM + IgA) Central Yes (1) Yes (18 mo ximelagatran in half of patients; 18 mo placebo in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff: “ratio ≥1 according to assay specifications” 
Taliani, 2009 (Europe) 2 RCTs 297 ∼15 Not described Local Not standardized No 
Schulman, 2006 (Europe) RCT ∼810 16 ACLA only (IgG) 4 central Yes (1) Yes (6 mo in half of patients; 6 wk in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff: 5 GPL units 
SourceDesignParticipantsCentersAPLA testing
Tests doneCentral/localPositivity predefined (minimum number of occasions with positive test)Any follow-up on therapy
Bank, 2003 (Europe) RCT 64 ACLA (IgG and IgM) and LA* Central Yes (1) Yes (3 mo Idra in half of patients; 3 mo VKA in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff: not described 
Ginsberg, 1995 (N. America) Cohort 65 ACLA (IgG) and LA* 1 center Yes (1) Time on, and after, VKA analyzed separately 
ACLA cutoff: >3 SD above mean (30 GPL units) 
Kearon, 1999 (N. America) RCT 77 22 ACLA (IgG + IgM) and LA* Central Yes (1) No 
ACLA cutoff not described 
Kearon, 2004 (N. America) RCT 141 15 ACLA (IgG + IgM) and LA* Central Yes (1) Yes (2 mo VKA in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff not described 
Rodger, 2008 (N. America, Europe) Cohort 619 12 ACLA (IgG+ IgM)§ and LA Central No (1) No 
ACLA cutoff: 6 U/mL for men, 4 U/mL for women§ 
Wahlander, 2005 (N. and S. America, Europe, Africa) RCT 1041 142 ACLA only (IgG, IgM + IgA) Central Yes (1) Yes (18 mo ximelagatran in half of patients; 18 mo placebo in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff: “ratio ≥1 according to assay specifications” 
Taliani, 2009 (Europe) 2 RCTs 297 ∼15 Not described Local Not standardized No 
Schulman, 2006 (Europe) RCT ∼810 16 ACLA only (IgG) 4 central Yes (1) Yes (6 mo in half of patients; 6 wk in half of patients) 
ACLA cutoff: 5 GPL units 

ACLA, anti-cardiolipin antibody; GPL, arbitrary unit of ACLA (IgG isotype) measurement; Idra, idraparinux; Ig, immunoglobulin; LA, lupus anticoagulant; RCT, randomized, controlled trial; SD, standard deviation; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.

*

Activated partial thromboplastin time.

Dilute Russell viper venom time.

Confirmatory hexagonal phospholipid assay.

§

Cutoff to categorize ACLA as positive was picked to maximize predictive value, and a different value was used for men (≥6 U/mL) and women (≥4 U/mL); “positive” APLA (ACLA or LA) was associated with a higher risk of recurrence in men and a trend to a lower risk of recurrence in women.

Of 448 total patients, 297 were included in APLA analysis. The decision to perform APLA testing appears to have been at the discretion of the clinical center and the reason why some patients were not tested is not provided.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal