Table 3

Treatment trials for patients with SMM

ReferenceStudyTherapyNTTPOS
Hjorth et al, 1993 RCT Initial vs delayed MP 50 SMM and IMM 12 mo No difference 
Riccardi et al, 1994 and 20005,6  RCT Initial vs delayed MP 145 DSS I ∼12 mo No difference 64 mo vs 71 mo 
Peest et al, 199578  Observational Delayed MP 54 DSS I 2-y PFS 75% Tumor-specific OS 80% at 60 mo 
Martin et al, 2002 Pilot Pamidronate 5 SMM and 7 IMM 2-y TTP 25%  
Musto et al, 2003 and D’Arena et al, 2011 RCT Pamidronate vs observation 177 SMM 5-y PFS 53% both arms; SRE 74% vs 39%, P = .009 Median OS 46 mo and 48 mo 
Musto et al, 200810  RCT Zoledronate vs observation × 1 y 163 SMM TTP: 67 mo vs 59 mo, P = NS SRE: 55% vs 78%, P = .04 OS not different 
Barlogie et al, 200811  Phase 2 Thalidomide pamidronate 76 SMM 4-y EFS 60% 4-y OS 91% 
Rajkumar et al, 200112,13  Phase 2 Thalidomide 19 SMM and 10 IMM Median 35 mo OS: 86 mo OS from treatment: 49 mo 
Weber et al, 200314  Phase 2 Thalidomide 28 high-risk SMM NA NA 
Witzig et al, 201348  RCT Thalidomide + ZA vs ZA 68 SMM 29 mo vs 14 mo 6 y > 70% 
Lust et al, 200979  Ph 2 Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist ± dexamethasone 47 SMM and IMM 37 mo  
Golombick et al, 200980  Crossover Curcumin vs placebo 17 SMM   
Mateos et al, 201315  RCT Lenalidomide + dexamethasone × 9 mo → lenalidomide maintenance × 15 mo vs observation 119 SMM 2-y PFS: 92% vs 50%, P < .001 3-y OS: 93% vs 76%, P = .04 
ReferenceStudyTherapyNTTPOS
Hjorth et al, 1993 RCT Initial vs delayed MP 50 SMM and IMM 12 mo No difference 
Riccardi et al, 1994 and 20005,6  RCT Initial vs delayed MP 145 DSS I ∼12 mo No difference 64 mo vs 71 mo 
Peest et al, 199578  Observational Delayed MP 54 DSS I 2-y PFS 75% Tumor-specific OS 80% at 60 mo 
Martin et al, 2002 Pilot Pamidronate 5 SMM and 7 IMM 2-y TTP 25%  
Musto et al, 2003 and D’Arena et al, 2011 RCT Pamidronate vs observation 177 SMM 5-y PFS 53% both arms; SRE 74% vs 39%, P = .009 Median OS 46 mo and 48 mo 
Musto et al, 200810  RCT Zoledronate vs observation × 1 y 163 SMM TTP: 67 mo vs 59 mo, P = NS SRE: 55% vs 78%, P = .04 OS not different 
Barlogie et al, 200811  Phase 2 Thalidomide pamidronate 76 SMM 4-y EFS 60% 4-y OS 91% 
Rajkumar et al, 200112,13  Phase 2 Thalidomide 19 SMM and 10 IMM Median 35 mo OS: 86 mo OS from treatment: 49 mo 
Weber et al, 200314  Phase 2 Thalidomide 28 high-risk SMM NA NA 
Witzig et al, 201348  RCT Thalidomide + ZA vs ZA 68 SMM 29 mo vs 14 mo 6 y > 70% 
Lust et al, 200979  Ph 2 Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist ± dexamethasone 47 SMM and IMM 37 mo  
Golombick et al, 200980  Crossover Curcumin vs placebo 17 SMM   
Mateos et al, 201315  RCT Lenalidomide + dexamethasone × 9 mo → lenalidomide maintenance × 15 mo vs observation 119 SMM 2-y PFS: 92% vs 50%, P < .001 3-y OS: 93% vs 76%, P = .04 

EFS, event-free survival; MP, melphalan-prednisone; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ZA, zoledronic acid.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal