Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis
| Variable . | P . | HR . | HR 95% CI . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | ||||
| Conditioning (MAC vs RIC) | .0251 | 7.524 | 1.287 | 44.000 |
| Match (match vs mismatch) | .2744* | 0.471 | 0.122 | 1.816 |
| HLH activity (not in remission vs remission) | .0806 | 4.322 | 0.837 | 22.330 |
| B | ||||
| Conditioning (MAC vs RIC) | .0181 | 6.348 | 1.371 | 29.394 |
| HLH activity (not in remission vs remission) | .0218 | 5.301 | 1.275 | 22.046 |
| Variable . | P . | HR . | HR 95% CI . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | ||||
| Conditioning (MAC vs RIC) | .0251 | 7.524 | 1.287 | 44.000 |
| Match (match vs mismatch) | .2744* | 0.471 | 0.122 | 1.816 |
| HLH activity (not in remission vs remission) | .0806 | 4.322 | 0.837 | 22.330 |
| B | ||||
| Conditioning (MAC vs RIC) | .0181 | 6.348 | 1.371 | 29.394 |
| HLH activity (not in remission vs remission) | .0218 | 5.301 | 1.275 | 22.046 |
In part A of the table, multivariate analysis included preparative regimen, match, and HLH activity; in part B, the effects of preparative regimen and HLH activity were analyzed with removal of the nonsignificant match effect.
HR indicates hazard ratio; and CI, confidence interval.
The effect of match was statistically significant in univariate analysis.