Table 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between marrow fibrosis and JAK2- or MPL-mutant allele burden in patients with ET or post-ET myelofibrosis belonging to the Pavia cohort (see Table 1)

Risk factors for the presence of fibrosis (covariates)Odds ratioP95% CI
Model 1 (including JAK2-mutated, MPL-mutated, and JAK2/MPL-unmutated patients)    
 Age at diagnosis (y) 1.01 .225 0.99-1.03 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2 (V617F) 3.22 .017 1.24-8.40 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2/MPL-unmutated patients 1.64 .323 0.62-4.37 
Model 2 (including JAK2-mutated and MPL-mutated patients exclusively)    
 Age at diagnosis (y) 1.01 .396 0.99-1.04 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2 (V617F) 2.42 .116 0.80-7.29 
 Mutation burden, % 1.05 <.001 1.03-1.07 
Model 3 (including JAK2-mutated and MPL-mutated patients exclusively)    
 Age at diagnosis (y) 1.01 .227 0.99-1.04 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2 (V617F) 2.67 .066 0.94-7.57 
 Mutation burden, >50% vs ≤50% 15.45 <.001 3.89-61.38 
Risk factors for the presence of fibrosis (covariates)Odds ratioP95% CI
Model 1 (including JAK2-mutated, MPL-mutated, and JAK2/MPL-unmutated patients)    
 Age at diagnosis (y) 1.01 .225 0.99-1.03 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2 (V617F) 3.22 .017 1.24-8.40 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2/MPL-unmutated patients 1.64 .323 0.62-4.37 
Model 2 (including JAK2-mutated and MPL-mutated patients exclusively)    
 Age at diagnosis (y) 1.01 .396 0.99-1.04 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2 (V617F) 2.42 .116 0.80-7.29 
 Mutation burden, % 1.05 <.001 1.03-1.07 
Model 3 (including JAK2-mutated and MPL-mutated patients exclusively)    
 Age at diagnosis (y) 1.01 .227 0.99-1.04 
MPL exon 10 mutation vs JAK2 (V617F) 2.67 .066 0.94-7.57 
 Mutation burden, >50% vs ≤50% 15.45 <.001 3.89-61.38 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal