Treatment responses to radiation therapy according to ATL lesion type
Patient . | ATL subtype . | Prior systemic therapy . | RT site . | Lesion type . | RT source . | RT energy . | Total dose, Gy . | Frac-tion dose, Gy . | Initial local response . | In-field relapse . | Out-of-field relapse . | Additional therapy after RT . | Time from RT to last evaluation, mo . | Disease at last evaluation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute | CHOP | Lt neck, Bl supraclav | Nodal | Photon | 6/15 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | Fludarabine/ cyclophosphamide/ LMB-2 | 2.4 | Local* + distant |
2 | Lymphomatous | Alemtuzumab | Rt groin | Nodal | Electron | 6 MeV | 24 | 2 | CR | No | Yes† | CHOP/denileukin diftitox | 16.7 | Distant* |
3 | Smoldering | Daclizumab, alemtuzumab | Rt scapula | Cutaneous | Electron | 9 MeV | 36 | 3 | PR | No | Yes† | Alemtuzumab, etoposide | 42.0 | Local + distant |
4 | Acute | CHOP, fludarabine/ cyclophosphamide/LMB-2, denileukin diftitox | Lt pelvic mass | Nodal | Photon | 15 MV | 20 | 2 | CR | No | Yes† | EPOCH/fludarabine, allo-transplant, intrathecal methotrexate, EPOCH/fludarabine | 10.0 | Local + distant |
5 | Acute | EPOCH/alemtuzumab, intrathecal methotrexate, fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/LMB-2 | Rt groin | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | No | 1.6 | Local* + distant |
Rt ankle | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | |||||||
Lt orbit | Extra-nodal | Photon | 6 MV | 15 | 3 | PR | No | |||||||
6 | Smoldering | EPOCH/rituximab/siplizumab, 7-hydroxystaurosporine, denileukin diftitox, nelfinavir/ alemtuzumab | Forehead | Cutaneous | Electron | 6 MeV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | Yes† | No | 15.8 | Local + distant |
Lt lower extremity | Cutaneous | Electron | 6 MeV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
Rt lower extremity | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 50 | 2 | PR | No | |||||||
Lt ankle | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 60 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
Lt nares, malar eminence | Cutaneous | Electron | 9 MeV | 60 | 2 | PR | No | |||||||
Submental chin | Cutaneous | Electron | 6 MeV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
Rt Achilles heel | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
7‡ | Acute | CHOP, denileukin diftitox | Bl neck | Nodal | Photon | 6/15 MV | 50 | 2 | PR | No | No | No | 0.3 | Local |
8 | Acute | EPOCH/rituximab, denileukin diftitox, alemtuzumab | Lt neck, supraclav | Nodal | Photon | 6 MV | 12 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | No | 0.1 | Local* + distant |
Rt head/neck | Nodal | Electron | 9 MeV | 12 | 3 | CR | No | |||||||
9 | Acute | CHOP, alemtuzumab/ deoxycoformycin, intrathecal methotrexate | Whole brain | Lepto-meningeal | Photon | 6 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | No | 0.4 | Local* + distant |
10 | Acute | CHOP, EPOCH, yttrium-90 daclizumab | T-spine | Nodal | Photon | 15 MV | 24 | 2 | PR | No | Yes | No | 0.3 | Local* + distant |
C-spine | Nodal | Photon | 6 MV | 24 | 2 | PR | No |
Patient . | ATL subtype . | Prior systemic therapy . | RT site . | Lesion type . | RT source . | RT energy . | Total dose, Gy . | Frac-tion dose, Gy . | Initial local response . | In-field relapse . | Out-of-field relapse . | Additional therapy after RT . | Time from RT to last evaluation, mo . | Disease at last evaluation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute | CHOP | Lt neck, Bl supraclav | Nodal | Photon | 6/15 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | Fludarabine/ cyclophosphamide/ LMB-2 | 2.4 | Local* + distant |
2 | Lymphomatous | Alemtuzumab | Rt groin | Nodal | Electron | 6 MeV | 24 | 2 | CR | No | Yes† | CHOP/denileukin diftitox | 16.7 | Distant* |
3 | Smoldering | Daclizumab, alemtuzumab | Rt scapula | Cutaneous | Electron | 9 MeV | 36 | 3 | PR | No | Yes† | Alemtuzumab, etoposide | 42.0 | Local + distant |
4 | Acute | CHOP, fludarabine/ cyclophosphamide/LMB-2, denileukin diftitox | Lt pelvic mass | Nodal | Photon | 15 MV | 20 | 2 | CR | No | Yes† | EPOCH/fludarabine, allo-transplant, intrathecal methotrexate, EPOCH/fludarabine | 10.0 | Local + distant |
5 | Acute | EPOCH/alemtuzumab, intrathecal methotrexate, fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/LMB-2 | Rt groin | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | No | 1.6 | Local* + distant |
Rt ankle | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | |||||||
Lt orbit | Extra-nodal | Photon | 6 MV | 15 | 3 | PR | No | |||||||
6 | Smoldering | EPOCH/rituximab/siplizumab, 7-hydroxystaurosporine, denileukin diftitox, nelfinavir/ alemtuzumab | Forehead | Cutaneous | Electron | 6 MeV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | Yes† | No | 15.8 | Local + distant |
Lt lower extremity | Cutaneous | Electron | 6 MeV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
Rt lower extremity | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 50 | 2 | PR | No | |||||||
Lt ankle | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 60 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
Lt nares, malar eminence | Cutaneous | Electron | 9 MeV | 60 | 2 | PR | No | |||||||
Submental chin | Cutaneous | Electron | 6 MeV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
Rt Achilles heel | Cutaneous | Photon | 6 MV | 50 | 2 | CR | No | |||||||
7‡ | Acute | CHOP, denileukin diftitox | Bl neck | Nodal | Photon | 6/15 MV | 50 | 2 | PR | No | No | No | 0.3 | Local |
8 | Acute | EPOCH/rituximab, denileukin diftitox, alemtuzumab | Lt neck, supraclav | Nodal | Photon | 6 MV | 12 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | No | 0.1 | Local* + distant |
Rt head/neck | Nodal | Electron | 9 MeV | 12 | 3 | CR | No | |||||||
9 | Acute | CHOP, alemtuzumab/ deoxycoformycin, intrathecal methotrexate | Whole brain | Lepto-meningeal | Photon | 6 MV | 30 | 3 | PR | No | Yes | No | 0.4 | Local* + distant |
10 | Acute | CHOP, EPOCH, yttrium-90 daclizumab | T-spine | Nodal | Photon | 15 MV | 24 | 2 | PR | No | Yes | No | 0.3 | Local* + distant |
C-spine | Nodal | Photon | 6 MV | 24 | 2 | PR | No |
RT indicates radiation therapy; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone; Lt, left; Bl, bilateral; PR, partial response; Rt, right; CR, complete response; and EPOCH, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone.
Disease status at the time of patient mortality.
Patients with new out-of-field disease, as opposed to patients with out-of-field progression of disease that was evident before starting radiation therapy. The times from the completion of radiation therapy to the identification of new out-of field disease in these patients were as follows: patient 2, 9.7 mo; patient 3, 13.8 mo; patient 4, 0.9 mo; and patient 6, 1.9 mo (mean, 6.6 mo).
This male patient was from Haiti. The remaining 9 patients were women from Jamaica.