Table 2

Frequency and types of secondary genetic abnormalities in 176 patients with inv(16) AML

Secondary genetic abnormalityPatients with aberration, n (%)Patients with missing values, n
Chromosomal aberration  
    Absent 103 (61)  
        Present* 65 (39)  
        Trisomy 22 31 (18)  
        Trisomy 8 27 (16)  
        Del(7q) 9 (5)  
        Other 10 (6)  
RAS mutation 91 (53) 
NRAS mutation 78 (45) 
    Exon 1 45 (26) 
    Exon 2 42 (24) 
KRAS mutation 22 (13) 
    Exon 1 19 (11) 
    Exon 2 3 (2) 
KIT mutation§ 65 (37) 
    Exon 8 44 (25) 
    Exon 10 0 (0) 
    Exon 11 3 (2) 
    Exon 17 24 (14) 
FLT3 mutation 30 (17) 
    FLT3-ITD 8 (5) 
    FLT3-TKD 25 (14) 
JAK2V617F mutation 
Secondary genetic abnormalityPatients with aberration, n (%)Patients with missing values, n
Chromosomal aberration  
    Absent 103 (61)  
        Present* 65 (39)  
        Trisomy 22 31 (18)  
        Trisomy 8 27 (16)  
        Del(7q) 9 (5)  
        Other 10 (6)  
RAS mutation 91 (53) 
NRAS mutation 78 (45) 
    Exon 1 45 (26) 
    Exon 2 42 (24) 
KRAS mutation 22 (13) 
    Exon 1 19 (11) 
    Exon 2 3 (2) 
KIT mutation§ 65 (37) 
    Exon 8 44 (25) 
    Exon 10 0 (0) 
    Exon 11 3 (2) 
    Exon 17 24 (14) 
FLT3 mutation 30 (17) 
    FLT3-ITD 8 (5) 
    FLT3-TKD 25 (14) 
JAK2V617F mutation 

To estimate the frequency of a distinct genetic lesion in the entire cohort data on missing cases is considered in the denominator.

*

There were patients with more than 1 additional chromosome aberration; thus, the numbers for the distinct additional chromosome aberrations add to more than 65.

Nine cases with a mutation in both NRAS and KRAS.

Nine cases with a NRAS mutation in both exon 1 and 2.

§

Six cases with a KIT mutation in both exon 8 and 17.

One case scored as mutated by DHPLC but could not be resolved by sequencing due to the presence of low number of mutated cells in the sample.

Three cases with concurrent FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD mutation.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal