Table 2

Hazard ratios for NRM and OS by multivariate regression

Predictor (n)NRM
OS
HRPHRP
HCT-CI score     
    0 (n = 1119)   
    1-2 (n = 441) 1.54 < .001 1.29 .009 
    ≥ 3 (n = 377) 1.90 < .000 1.93 < .000 
High-risk disease (n = 1355) vs low-risk 1.62 < .000 1.75 < .000 
Age > 50 y (n = 824) 1.33 .008 1.25 .004 
Myeloablative regimen (n = 1083) vs RIC 1.04 .675 1.33 .002 
PBSC (n = 1466) vs bone marrow 1.03 .813 0.98 .910 
Male sex (n = 1108) vs female 0.87 .234 1.00 .925 
Unrelated donor (n = 979) vs related 2.01 < .000 1.38 < .000 
Female donor/male recipient (n = 390) vs other 1.07 .571 1.00 .952 
CMV serostatus donor/recipient (n = 192) vs other 0.92 .592 0.86 .171 
Predictor (n)NRM
OS
HRPHRP
HCT-CI score     
    0 (n = 1119)   
    1-2 (n = 441) 1.54 < .001 1.29 .009 
    ≥ 3 (n = 377) 1.90 < .000 1.93 < .000 
High-risk disease (n = 1355) vs low-risk 1.62 < .000 1.75 < .000 
Age > 50 y (n = 824) 1.33 .008 1.25 .004 
Myeloablative regimen (n = 1083) vs RIC 1.04 .675 1.33 .002 
PBSC (n = 1466) vs bone marrow 1.03 .813 0.98 .910 
Male sex (n = 1108) vs female 0.87 .234 1.00 .925 
Unrelated donor (n = 979) vs related 2.01 < .000 1.38 < .000 
Female donor/male recipient (n = 390) vs other 1.07 .571 1.00 .952 
CMV serostatus donor/recipient (n = 192) vs other 0.92 .592 0.86 .171 

RIC indicates reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen; and PBSCs, peripheral blood stem cells.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal