Table 1

Correlation of CLL risk factors and AID expression

ParameterCox regression proportional hazard
Univariate
Multivariate
PHR95% CIPHR95% CI
Unmutated IGHV .0058 3.991 1.494-10.661 .0191 3.260 1.213-8.760 
CD38+ .0855 2.034 0.906-4.567    
ZAP-70+ .0046 3.267 1.440-7.413 .0653 2.192 0.951-5.049 
High-risk aberrations .0612 2.172 0.964-4.892    
AID+ .0055 3.080 1.392-6.817 .0244 2.524 1.127-5.651 
ParameterCox regression proportional hazard
Univariate
Multivariate
PHR95% CIPHR95% CI
Unmutated IGHV .0058 3.991 1.494-10.661 .0191 3.260 1.213-8.760 
CD38+ .0855 2.034 0.906-4.567    
ZAP-70+ .0046 3.267 1.440-7.413 .0653 2.192 0.951-5.049 
High-risk aberrations .0612 2.172 0.964-4.892    
AID+ .0055 3.080 1.392-6.817 .0244 2.524 1.127-5.651 

Individual Cox regressions were used to examine the association between each factor and TFT on 83 CLL patients with data for all parameters listed. Factors were then included in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to examine the joint effects of those factors on TFT. Best subsets selection was used to select the final multivariate model. Factors that did not fit the multivariate best model are indicated by “-”. High-risk aberrations (+), that is, patient cells having at least 1 of the 3 aberrations 11q22.3, 12-CEN, or 17p12.1, were compared against those with 0 of 3.

HR indicates hazard ratio; and CI, confidence interval.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal