Table 1

Frequency of molecular mutations in distinct cytogenetic risk groups

Favorable
Intermediate
Unfavorable
t(15;17)(q22;q12) PML/RARA, n = 33 (%)t(8;21)(q22;q22) RUNX1/RUNX1T1, n = 40 (%)inv(16)(p13q22) CBFB/MYH11, n = 33 (%)Normal karyotype, n = 447 (%)Intermediate-risk aberrant karyotype, n = 241 (%)Complex karyotype, n = 116 (%)Other unfavorable, n = 90 (%)
NPM1 0/12 0/36 0/24 228/447 (51.0) 47/241 (19.5) 4/116 (3.4) 3/90 (3.3) 
FLT3-ITD 18/33 (54) 1/39 (2.6) 6/33 (18.2) 95/447 (21.3) 28/241 (11.6) 4/116 (3.4) 7/90 (7.8) 
CEPBA 2/33 (6.1) 0/39 0/31 52/447 (11.6) 16/241 (6.6) 1/116 (0.9) 4/90 (4.4) 
    CEPBA single-mut 2/2 0/0 0/0 17/52 (32.7) 8/16 (50.0) 1/1 3/4 
    CEPBA double-mut 0/2 0/0 0/0 35/52 (67.3) 8/16 (50.0) 0/1 1/4 
MLL-PTD 0/2 0/31 0/25 35/447 (7.8) 11/241 (4.6) 3/116 (2.6) 8/90 (8.9) 
ASXL1 0/0 0/39 0/4 55/447 (12.3) 62/241 (25.7) 9/116 (7.8) 18/90 (20) 
RUNX1 0/0 0/2 0/11 78/447 (17.4) 59/241 (24.5) 5/116 (4.3) 20/90 (22.2) 
TP53 0/33 1/40 (2.5) 0/33 5/447 (1.1) 7/241 (2.9) 85/116 (73.3) 17/90 (18.9) 
Favorable
Intermediate
Unfavorable
t(15;17)(q22;q12) PML/RARA, n = 33 (%)t(8;21)(q22;q22) RUNX1/RUNX1T1, n = 40 (%)inv(16)(p13q22) CBFB/MYH11, n = 33 (%)Normal karyotype, n = 447 (%)Intermediate-risk aberrant karyotype, n = 241 (%)Complex karyotype, n = 116 (%)Other unfavorable, n = 90 (%)
NPM1 0/12 0/36 0/24 228/447 (51.0) 47/241 (19.5) 4/116 (3.4) 3/90 (3.3) 
FLT3-ITD 18/33 (54) 1/39 (2.6) 6/33 (18.2) 95/447 (21.3) 28/241 (11.6) 4/116 (3.4) 7/90 (7.8) 
CEPBA 2/33 (6.1) 0/39 0/31 52/447 (11.6) 16/241 (6.6) 1/116 (0.9) 4/90 (4.4) 
    CEPBA single-mut 2/2 0/0 0/0 17/52 (32.7) 8/16 (50.0) 1/1 3/4 
    CEPBA double-mut 0/2 0/0 0/0 35/52 (67.3) 8/16 (50.0) 0/1 1/4 
MLL-PTD 0/2 0/31 0/25 35/447 (7.8) 11/241 (4.6) 3/116 (2.6) 8/90 (8.9) 
ASXL1 0/0 0/39 0/4 55/447 (12.3) 62/241 (25.7) 9/116 (7.8) 18/90 (20) 
RUNX1 0/0 0/2 0/11 78/447 (17.4) 59/241 (24.5) 5/116 (4.3) 20/90 (22.2) 
TP53 0/33 1/40 (2.5) 0/33 5/447 (1.1) 7/241 (2.9) 85/116 (73.3) 17/90 (18.9) 

Within the favorable cytogenetic risk group, cases were not analyzed for all molecular markers because the hierarchical model prognostic assignment was based on the detection of the specific fusion transcript irrespective of further mutations.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal