Table 2

MDS Cytogenetic Scoring System

Prognostic subgroups, % of patientsCytogenetic abnormalitiesMedian survival,* yMedian AML evolution, 25%,* yHazard ratios OS/AML*Hazard ratios OS/AML
Very good (4%*/3%−Y, del(11q) 5.4 NR 0.7/0.4 0.5/0.5 
Good (72%*/66%Normal, del(5q), del(12p), del(20q), double including del(5q) 4.8 9.4 1/1 1/1 
Intermediate (13%*/19%del(7q), +8, +19, i(17q), any other single or double independent clones 2.7 2.5 1.5/1.8 1.6/2.2 
Poor (4%*/5%−7, inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q), double including −7/del(7q), complex: 3 abnormalities 1.5 1.7 2.3/2.3 2.6/3.4 
Very poor (7%*/7%Complex: > 3 abnormalities 0.7 0.7 3.8/3.6 4.2/4.9 
Prognostic subgroups, % of patientsCytogenetic abnormalitiesMedian survival,* yMedian AML evolution, 25%,* yHazard ratios OS/AML*Hazard ratios OS/AML
Very good (4%*/3%−Y, del(11q) 5.4 NR 0.7/0.4 0.5/0.5 
Good (72%*/66%Normal, del(5q), del(12p), del(20q), double including del(5q) 4.8 9.4 1/1 1/1 
Intermediate (13%*/19%del(7q), +8, +19, i(17q), any other single or double independent clones 2.7 2.5 1.5/1.8 1.6/2.2 
Poor (4%*/5%−7, inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q), double including −7/del(7q), complex: 3 abnormalities 1.5 1.7 2.3/2.3 2.6/3.4 
Very poor (7%*/7%Complex: > 3 abnormalities 0.7 0.7 3.8/3.6 4.2/4.9 

OS indicates overall survival; and NR, not reached.

*

Data from patients in this IWG-PM database, multivariate analysis (n = 7012).

Data from Schanz et al (n = 2754).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal