Table 3

Time landmarks and response criteria to TKI

Time, moFailureSuboptimal responseWarnings
Diagnosis NA NA High risk; del(9q-); additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph+ cells 
No HR; stable disease or disease progression Less than CHR NA 
Less than CHR; no cytogenetic response: Ph+ > 95% Less than PCyR; Ph+ > 35% NA 
12 Less than PCyR; Ph+ > 35% Less than CCyR Less than MMR 
18 Less than CCyR Less than MMR NA 
Anytime Loss of CHR; loss of CCyR; mutation (ex. T315I) Additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph+ cells; loss of MMR; mutation Any rise in transcript level; additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph cells 
Time, moFailureSuboptimal responseWarnings
Diagnosis NA NA High risk; del(9q-); additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph+ cells 
No HR; stable disease or disease progression Less than CHR NA 
Less than CHR; no cytogenetic response: Ph+ > 95% Less than PCyR; Ph+ > 35% NA 
12 Less than PCyR; Ph+ > 35% Less than CCyR Less than MMR 
18 Less than CCyR Less than MMR NA 
Anytime Loss of CHR; loss of CCyR; mutation (ex. T315I) Additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph+ cells; loss of MMR; mutation Any rise in transcript level; additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph cells 

These landmarks were established based on imatinib trials. For the second-generation TKI, these will probably be revised in the next year based on adult responses. Whether time to reach landmarks with the more potent second-generation TKI results in comparable clinical outcomes is not currently known. The most important landmark and predictor for success is complete cytogenetic response.

NA indicates not applicable.

Adapted from Goldman40  and Baccarani et al41  with permission.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal