Comparison of prognostic risk distribution
| . | Cervantes (%)6 . | Gangat (%)8 . | Chinese (%) . | P . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPSS risk | < .001 | |||
| Low | 232 (22) | 100 (16) | ||
| Intermediate-1 | 306 (29) | 279 (43) | ||
| Intermediate-2 | 295 (28) | 197 (31) | ||
| High | 221 (21) | 66 (10) | ||
| DIPSS risk | < .001 | |||
| Low | 75 (9) | 100 (16) | ||
| Intermediate-1 | 248 (31) | 305 (48) | ||
| Intermediate-2 | 370 (47) | 228 (36) | ||
| High | 100 (13) | 9 (1) |
| . | Cervantes (%)6 . | Gangat (%)8 . | Chinese (%) . | P . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPSS risk | < .001 | |||
| Low | 232 (22) | 100 (16) | ||
| Intermediate-1 | 306 (29) | 279 (43) | ||
| Intermediate-2 | 295 (28) | 197 (31) | ||
| High | 221 (21) | 66 (10) | ||
| DIPSS risk | < .001 | |||
| Low | 75 (9) | 100 (16) | ||
| Intermediate-1 | 248 (31) | 305 (48) | ||
| Intermediate-2 | 370 (47) | 228 (36) | ||
| High | 100 (13) | 9 (1) |