Table 5

Summary of benefits and limitations of maintenance therapy with novel drugs for clinical decision making

DrugDose/regimenDuration of therapyImpact on
Risk groupsToleranceLevel of evidence/rade of recommendationComments
Quality of responsePFSOS
Thalidomide 50* (100) mg/d Up to 1 y, no correlation between duration and outcome Yes Yes Yes, preferentially if not part of the induction regimen; yes, in meta-analysis No benefit In FISH defined high-risk patients§ Possible benefit in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetics and GEP-defined high risk PNP, fatigue and other limiting dose and duration of therapy I/A Poor tolerance in some (particularly elderly) patients; not recommended for patients with FISH defined high-risk profile 
Lenalidomide 10 (5-15) mg/d continuously or days 1-21, every 28 d Until PD or intolerance Yes Yes Presently shown in one-third of studies Does not overcome negative impact of FISH-defined unfavorable cytogenetics Few discontinuations because of AEs I/A Unprecedented extension of PFS, increase in OS in 1 of 3 studies; usually well tolerated, increased risk for secondary primary malignancies 
Bortezomib 1.3 mg biweekly 2 y or until PD or intolerance Yes Yes Yes Active in patients with renal failure and cytogenetic risk groups PNP grades 3 or 4: 16% (based on intravenous administration) Not applicable Only comparison between PAD-ASCT bortezomib with VAD-ASCT thalidomide available 
Bortezomib-thalidomide GIMEMA: bortezomib-thalidomide yielded increased PFS vs control. PETHEMA: bortezomib-thalidomide resulted in a tendency for increased PFS vs VP. In both studies, an impact on OS was not observed. Results of ongoing trials need to be awaited. 
DrugDose/regimenDuration of therapyImpact on
Risk groupsToleranceLevel of evidence/rade of recommendationComments
Quality of responsePFSOS
Thalidomide 50* (100) mg/d Up to 1 y, no correlation between duration and outcome Yes Yes Yes, preferentially if not part of the induction regimen; yes, in meta-analysis No benefit In FISH defined high-risk patients§ Possible benefit in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetics and GEP-defined high risk PNP, fatigue and other limiting dose and duration of therapy I/A Poor tolerance in some (particularly elderly) patients; not recommended for patients with FISH defined high-risk profile 
Lenalidomide 10 (5-15) mg/d continuously or days 1-21, every 28 d Until PD or intolerance Yes Yes Presently shown in one-third of studies Does not overcome negative impact of FISH-defined unfavorable cytogenetics Few discontinuations because of AEs I/A Unprecedented extension of PFS, increase in OS in 1 of 3 studies; usually well tolerated, increased risk for secondary primary malignancies 
Bortezomib 1.3 mg biweekly 2 y or until PD or intolerance Yes Yes Yes Active in patients with renal failure and cytogenetic risk groups PNP grades 3 or 4: 16% (based on intravenous administration) Not applicable Only comparison between PAD-ASCT bortezomib with VAD-ASCT thalidomide available 
Bortezomib-thalidomide GIMEMA: bortezomib-thalidomide yielded increased PFS vs control. PETHEMA: bortezomib-thalidomide resulted in a tendency for increased PFS vs VP. In both studies, an impact on OS was not observed. Results of ongoing trials need to be awaited. 
*

Lowest dose shown to be effective and therefore recommended; several studies used 100 mg or higher doses.

Spencer et al limited thalidomide therapy to 12 months.16 

Barlogie et al.19 

§

Morgan et al showed shortened survival in unfavorable FISH patients.17 

Recommended starting dose; doses have been adapted to 5-15 mg in the CALGB study.

Different regimens during induction therapy limit comparability with the thalidomide maintenance arm.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal