Table 1

Thalidomide maintenance studies after ASCT and conventional therapy

Study groupMedian age, y (no. of patients)Induction therapyMaintenance dose, duration of treatmentImprovement in quality of responseEFS or PFS*OS*Survival after relapseThalidomide tolerance
IFM 99-02: Attal et al15  (2006) Mean 59 ± 8 (N = 597) VAD: 3 or 4 cycles, Single ASCT (A) Thalidomide 400 mg/d until PD VGPR: (A) 67% 3-y EFS: (A) 52% 4-y OS: (A) 87% 1-y OS: (A) 75% 39% stopped thalidomide because of side effects, mostly PNP, all grades of PNP 68%, grades 3 or 4: 7% 
    Pamidronate 90 mg, every 4 wks, until PD     
(B) Pamidronate 90 mg, every 4 wks, until PD (B) 55% (B) 37% (B) 74% (B) 73% 
(C) None (C) 57% (C) 36% (C) 77% (C) 78% 
 P = .03 P < .009 P < .04 P = .7 
ALLG MM6: Spencer et al16  (2009) ≤ 70 (N = 243) Mostly VAD Single ASCT (A) Thalidomide 100-200 mg/d, for 12 mo VGPR: (A) 65% 3-y PFS estimate: (A) 42% 3-y OS estimate: (A) 86% 1-y OS estimate: (A) 79% 30% stopped therapy because of intolerance (mostly PNP), 10% grades 3 or 4 PNP and 9% stopped because of PD 
    Prednisolone 50 mg on alternate days until PD     
(B) Prednisolone 50 mg on alternate days until PD (B) 44% (B) 23% (B) 75% (B) 77% 
P = .001 P < .001 P = .004 P = .237 
MRC Myeloma IX: Morgan et al17  (2012) Intensive, 59 (N = 493) CVAD vs CTD, single ASCT (A) Thalidomide, 50-100 mg/day, until PD No difference in the percentage of patients that upgraded response status P = .19 PFS: (A) 30 mo 3-year OS: (A) 75% (A) 20 mo 52.2% discontinued maintenance before PD mainly because of adverse events, median duration of treatment: 7 mo 
(B) None (B) 27 mo P = .003 (B) 80% P = .26 (B) 36 mo P = .003 
Nonintensive, 73 (N = 327) CTD attenuated vs MP (A) Thalidomide, 50-100 mg/day, until PD PFS: (A) 11 mo (A) 38 mo (A) 21 mo 
(B) None (B) 9 mo P = .014 (B) 39 mo P = .995 (B) 26 mo P = .25 
TT2: Barlogie et al18  (2006) ≤ 75, median NA (N = 668) Median follow-up: 42 mo (A) 4 induction cycles, double ASCT 4 consolidation cycles, thalidomide 400 mg/d during induction, 100 mg between ASCT, 200 mg with consolidation (A) Thalidomide 100 mg during the first year, thereafter 50 mg on alternate days, until PD CR: (A) 62% 4-y EFS: A) 65% OS: A) Not stated Median OS: A) 1.1 y 30% stopped thalidomide within 2 y 
 (B) Same induction without thalidomide (B) None (B) 43% P = .001 (B) 44% P = .01 (B) Not stated P = .9 (B) 2.7 y P = .001  
TT2: Barlogie et al19  (2008) Median follow-up: 70 mo   CR: (A) 64% EFS median: (A) 6.0 y 8-y OS estimate: (A) 57% 5-y OS estimate: (A) 27% ∼ 80% stopped thalidomide because of toxicity within 2 y 
  (B) 43% (B) 4.1 y (B) 44% (B) 23% 
    P = .001 P = .001 P = .09 P = .11  
TT2: Barlogie et al20  (2010) Median follow-up: 87 mo (N = 668)   NA EFS median: 4.8 y OS median 9 y 7.2 y OS estimate: NA 
(A) 45.2% 
(B) 42.2% 
P = .27 
HOVON 50: Lokhorst et al21  (2008) 56 (N = 556) VAD vs TAD Single or double ASCT (A) Thalidomide, 50 mg/d, until PD VGPR: EFS: Median: Median OS: PNP grades 2-4: ∼ 50% Treatment discontinued or dose reduced: 58% 
(A) 66% (A) 34 mo (A) 73 mo (A) 20 mo 
 (B) 22 mo, P < .001   
(B) IFN-α, 3 MU, 3 times weekly, until PD (B) 54% PFS: (B) 60 mo (B) 31 mo 
P = .005 (A) 34 mo P = .77 P = .009 
 (B) 25 mo P < .001   
NCIC CTG MY10: Stewart et al22  (2010) 58 (N = 332) Induction therapy not specified Single ASCT (A) Thalidomide 200 mg/d and alternate-day prednisone 50 mg, until PD  PFS: (A) 28 mo 4-y OS estimate: (A) 68%  Increased toxicity, including PNP and reduced quality of life, improved appetite, and sleep VTE: 7% 
(B) None  (B) 17 mo (B) 60%  VTE: 0% 
     P < .0001 P = .21   
CEMSG: Ludwig et al25  (2010) 72 (N = 124) Thalidomide/dexamethasone vs MP (A) Thalidomide 200 mg up to maximum tolerated dose, until PD IFN-α-2b, 3 MU, 3 times weekly (A) PR to VGPR or CR: 8% PFS: (A) 27.7 mo (A) 52.6 mo OS after PD: (A) 8.1 mo PNP grades 3 or 4: 11% 
   (B) IFN-α-2b, 3 MU, 3 times weekly (B) PR to VGPR or CR: 2% (B) 13.2 mo P = .0068 (B) 51.4 mo P = .81 (B) 25.5 mo P = .056  
Study groupMedian age, y (no. of patients)Induction therapyMaintenance dose, duration of treatmentImprovement in quality of responseEFS or PFS*OS*Survival after relapseThalidomide tolerance
IFM 99-02: Attal et al15  (2006) Mean 59 ± 8 (N = 597) VAD: 3 or 4 cycles, Single ASCT (A) Thalidomide 400 mg/d until PD VGPR: (A) 67% 3-y EFS: (A) 52% 4-y OS: (A) 87% 1-y OS: (A) 75% 39% stopped thalidomide because of side effects, mostly PNP, all grades of PNP 68%, grades 3 or 4: 7% 
    Pamidronate 90 mg, every 4 wks, until PD     
(B) Pamidronate 90 mg, every 4 wks, until PD (B) 55% (B) 37% (B) 74% (B) 73% 
(C) None (C) 57% (C) 36% (C) 77% (C) 78% 
 P = .03 P < .009 P < .04 P = .7 
ALLG MM6: Spencer et al16  (2009) ≤ 70 (N = 243) Mostly VAD Single ASCT (A) Thalidomide 100-200 mg/d, for 12 mo VGPR: (A) 65% 3-y PFS estimate: (A) 42% 3-y OS estimate: (A) 86% 1-y OS estimate: (A) 79% 30% stopped therapy because of intolerance (mostly PNP), 10% grades 3 or 4 PNP and 9% stopped because of PD 
    Prednisolone 50 mg on alternate days until PD     
(B) Prednisolone 50 mg on alternate days until PD (B) 44% (B) 23% (B) 75% (B) 77% 
P = .001 P < .001 P = .004 P = .237 
MRC Myeloma IX: Morgan et al17  (2012) Intensive, 59 (N = 493) CVAD vs CTD, single ASCT (A) Thalidomide, 50-100 mg/day, until PD No difference in the percentage of patients that upgraded response status P = .19 PFS: (A) 30 mo 3-year OS: (A) 75% (A) 20 mo 52.2% discontinued maintenance before PD mainly because of adverse events, median duration of treatment: 7 mo 
(B) None (B) 27 mo P = .003 (B) 80% P = .26 (B) 36 mo P = .003 
Nonintensive, 73 (N = 327) CTD attenuated vs MP (A) Thalidomide, 50-100 mg/day, until PD PFS: (A) 11 mo (A) 38 mo (A) 21 mo 
(B) None (B) 9 mo P = .014 (B) 39 mo P = .995 (B) 26 mo P = .25 
TT2: Barlogie et al18  (2006) ≤ 75, median NA (N = 668) Median follow-up: 42 mo (A) 4 induction cycles, double ASCT 4 consolidation cycles, thalidomide 400 mg/d during induction, 100 mg between ASCT, 200 mg with consolidation (A) Thalidomide 100 mg during the first year, thereafter 50 mg on alternate days, until PD CR: (A) 62% 4-y EFS: A) 65% OS: A) Not stated Median OS: A) 1.1 y 30% stopped thalidomide within 2 y 
 (B) Same induction without thalidomide (B) None (B) 43% P = .001 (B) 44% P = .01 (B) Not stated P = .9 (B) 2.7 y P = .001  
TT2: Barlogie et al19  (2008) Median follow-up: 70 mo   CR: (A) 64% EFS median: (A) 6.0 y 8-y OS estimate: (A) 57% 5-y OS estimate: (A) 27% ∼ 80% stopped thalidomide because of toxicity within 2 y 
  (B) 43% (B) 4.1 y (B) 44% (B) 23% 
    P = .001 P = .001 P = .09 P = .11  
TT2: Barlogie et al20  (2010) Median follow-up: 87 mo (N = 668)   NA EFS median: 4.8 y OS median 9 y 7.2 y OS estimate: NA 
(A) 45.2% 
(B) 42.2% 
P = .27 
HOVON 50: Lokhorst et al21  (2008) 56 (N = 556) VAD vs TAD Single or double ASCT (A) Thalidomide, 50 mg/d, until PD VGPR: EFS: Median: Median OS: PNP grades 2-4: ∼ 50% Treatment discontinued or dose reduced: 58% 
(A) 66% (A) 34 mo (A) 73 mo (A) 20 mo 
 (B) 22 mo, P < .001   
(B) IFN-α, 3 MU, 3 times weekly, until PD (B) 54% PFS: (B) 60 mo (B) 31 mo 
P = .005 (A) 34 mo P = .77 P = .009 
 (B) 25 mo P < .001   
NCIC CTG MY10: Stewart et al22  (2010) 58 (N = 332) Induction therapy not specified Single ASCT (A) Thalidomide 200 mg/d and alternate-day prednisone 50 mg, until PD  PFS: (A) 28 mo 4-y OS estimate: (A) 68%  Increased toxicity, including PNP and reduced quality of life, improved appetite, and sleep VTE: 7% 
(B) None  (B) 17 mo (B) 60%  VTE: 0% 
     P < .0001 P = .21   
CEMSG: Ludwig et al25  (2010) 72 (N = 124) Thalidomide/dexamethasone vs MP (A) Thalidomide 200 mg up to maximum tolerated dose, until PD IFN-α-2b, 3 MU, 3 times weekly (A) PR to VGPR or CR: 8% PFS: (A) 27.7 mo (A) 52.6 mo OS after PD: (A) 8.1 mo PNP grades 3 or 4: 11% 
   (B) IFN-α-2b, 3 MU, 3 times weekly (B) PR to VGPR or CR: 2% (B) 13.2 mo P = .0068 (B) 51.4 mo P = .81 (B) 25.5 mo P = .056  
*

Data are median values unless otherwise stated.

Same regimen for intensive and nonintensive patients.

Results for intensive and nonintensive group combined.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal