Table 2 Most common cytogenetic data of... | American Society of Hematology

Table 2

Most common cytogenetic data of 119 patients with t(8;21)* and 79 patients with inv(16) treated with or without HAM

	With HAM		No HAM		P	Total
	n	%	N	%	P	n	%
t(8;21) [solely]	19	27	18	4	.31	37	31
t(8;21) −Y†	22	31	11	23	.37	33	28
t(8;21) −X†	16	22	8	17	.47	24	20
t(8;21) del(9q) †	5	7	8	17	.10	13	11
t(8;21) +8†	6	9	3	6	.66	9	8
inv(16) [solely]	28	65	25	69	.68	53	65
inv(16) +22†	5	12	6	17	.52	11	14
inv(16) + other‡	10	23	5	14	.29	15	19

	With HAM		No HAM		P	Total
	n	%	N	%	P	n	%
t(8;21) [solely]	19	27	18	4	.31	37	31
t(8;21) −Y†	22	31	11	23	.37	33	28
t(8;21) −X†	16	22	8	17	.47	24	20
t(8;21) del(9q) †	5	7	8	17	.10	13	11
t(8;21) +8†	6	9	3	6	.66	9	8
inv(16) [solely]	28	65	25	69	.68	53	65
inv(16) +22†	5	12	6	17	.52	11	14
inv(16) + other‡	10	23	5	14	.29	15	19

Of 119 patients with data on cytogenetics, 17 patients had other secondary aberrations, including multiple nomination.

As a sole aberration or with additional aberrations.

Further aberrations.