Sensitivity and specificity of measurement of analytes before GVHD treatment
| A. Derived from Figure 2, for prediction of grade 3-4 GVHD . | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Yes GVHD 3-4 . | No GVHD 3-4 . | . | ||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 3-4 | 6 | 9 | PPV 40% | ||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 2 | 2 | 59 | |||||||||||
| Sensitivity 75% | Specificity 87% | ||||||||||||
| B. Derived fromFigure 2 , for prediction of NRM | Yes NRM | No NRM | |||||||||||
| Predicted NRM | 9 | 9 | PPV 50% | ||||||||||
| Predicted Negative | 2 | 56 | |||||||||||
| Sensitivity 82% | Specificity 86% | ||||||||||||
| C. Derived fromFigure 3 , landmark analysis for prediction of grade 3-4 GVHD | Yes GVHD 3-4 | No GVHD 3-4 | |||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 3-4 | 8 | 42 | PPV 16% | ||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 0-2 | 3 | 114 | |||||||||||
| Sensitivity 73% | Specificity 73% | ||||||||||||
| A. Derived from Figure 2, for prediction of grade 3-4 GVHD . | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Yes GVHD 3-4 . | No GVHD 3-4 . | . | ||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 3-4 | 6 | 9 | PPV 40% | ||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 2 | 2 | 59 | |||||||||||
| Sensitivity 75% | Specificity 87% | ||||||||||||
| B. Derived fromFigure 2 , for prediction of NRM | Yes NRM | No NRM | |||||||||||
| Predicted NRM | 9 | 9 | PPV 50% | ||||||||||
| Predicted Negative | 2 | 56 | |||||||||||
| Sensitivity 82% | Specificity 86% | ||||||||||||
| C. Derived fromFigure 3 , landmark analysis for prediction of grade 3-4 GVHD | Yes GVHD 3-4 | No GVHD 3-4 | |||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 3-4 | 8 | 42 | PPV 16% | ||||||||||
| Predicted GVHD 0-2 | 3 | 114 | |||||||||||
| Sensitivity 73% | Specificity 73% | ||||||||||||
PPV, positive predictive value.