Table 3

Incidence of molecular mutations in AML subgroups AML-NOS, AML-MRC with MDS-related cytogenetics and/or MDS/MPN history, and AML-MLD-sole

Mutation (no. of patients analyzed*)Patients with mutation, n (%)AML-NOS n = 233 (%)AML-MRC due to cytogenetics and/or MDS or MDS/MPN history n = 85 (%)AML-MLD-sole n = 90 (%)P
NPM1 (n = 397) 203 (51.1) 144 (62.3) 10 (12.3) 49 (57.6) < .001 
FLT3-ITD (n = 398) 89 (22.4) 68 (29.4) 6 (7.4) 15 (17.4) < .001 
NRAS (n = 187) 24 (12.8) 8 (8.7) 8 (16.0) 8 (17.8) NS 
MLL-PTD (n = 399) 24 (6.0) 10 (4.3) 6 (7.4) 8 (9.3) NS 
CEBPA (n = 225) 17 (7.6) 9 (7.1) 3 (6.7) 5 (9.3) NS 
Mutation (no. of patients analyzed*)Patients with mutation, n (%)AML-NOS n = 233 (%)AML-MRC due to cytogenetics and/or MDS or MDS/MPN history n = 85 (%)AML-MLD-sole n = 90 (%)P
NPM1 (n = 397) 203 (51.1) 144 (62.3) 10 (12.3) 49 (57.6) < .001 
FLT3-ITD (n = 398) 89 (22.4) 68 (29.4) 6 (7.4) 15 (17.4) < .001 
NRAS (n = 187) 24 (12.8) 8 (8.7) 8 (16.0) 8 (17.8) NS 
MLL-PTD (n = 399) 24 (6.0) 10 (4.3) 6 (7.4) 8 (9.3) NS 
CEBPA (n = 225) 17 (7.6) 9 (7.1) 3 (6.7) 5 (9.3) NS 

The P values result from the comparison of the frequency of molecular markers between the 3 cohorts (patients with AML-NOS, AML-MRC because of cytogenetics, and MDS history, or AML-MLD-sole).

NS indicates not significant.

*

From our cohort of 408 patients.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal