Table 1

Capture efficiency and sequencing statistics for WES results

DNA pool #1DNA pool #2DNA pool #3DNA pool #4
Total read (k) 205 303 205 335 200 960 209 335 
After trimmed (k) 203 977 204 017 198 493 206 924 
Genome mapped (k) 180 133 179 889 175 683 181 008 
On target (k) 129 112 133 493 111 209 128 144 
Mean coverage (×) 179.6 188.0 157.5 163.7 
% on target at 100× coverage 62.73 66.30 59.86 61.21 
Pearson correlation with SNP 6.0 0.985 0.983 0.983 0.984 
DNA pool #1DNA pool #2DNA pool #3DNA pool #4
Total read (k) 205 303 205 335 200 960 209 335 
After trimmed (k) 203 977 204 017 198 493 206 924 
Genome mapped (k) 180 133 179 889 175 683 181 008 
On target (k) 129 112 133 493 111 209 128 144 
Mean coverage (×) 179.6 188.0 157.5 163.7 
% on target at 100× coverage 62.73 66.30 59.86 61.21 
Pearson correlation with SNP 6.0 0.985 0.983 0.983 0.984 

The DNA pools contained 52 control patients in DNA pool #1; 52 control patients in DNA pool #2; 60 patients with stroke in DNA pool #3; and 60 patients with stroke in DNA pool #4. At >100× coverage, ∼60% of all sequences were on target for each of the DNA pools. Compared with the individual genotypes obtained from the SNP 6.0 arrays, a strong correlation with genotype data was generated by WES for each of the DNA pools.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal