Table 3

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with PFS after ASCT for myeloma

Patient groupNo.RR (95%CI)P
GR KIR3DS1 100 1.0  
GR KIR3DS1+ 46 1.9 (1.3-3.1) .002 
Bad risk KIR3DS1+ or KIR3DS1 33 3.0 (1.9-4.8) < .001 
Adjusted for albumin, β2M    
    GR KIR3DS1 89 1.0  
    GR KIR3DS1+ 41 1.8 (1.2-2.8) .008 
    Bad risk KIR3DS1+ or KIR3DS1 33 2.7 (1.6-4.3) .001 
Adjusted for albumin, β2M, and cytogenetics    
    GR KIR3DS1 36 1.0  
    GR KIR3DS1 12 2.7 (1.2-6.2) .021 
    Bad risk KIR3DS1+ or KIR3DS 20 5.3 (2.4-11.7) < .001 
Patient groupNo.RR (95%CI)P
GR KIR3DS1 100 1.0  
GR KIR3DS1+ 46 1.9 (1.3-3.1) .002 
Bad risk KIR3DS1+ or KIR3DS1 33 3.0 (1.9-4.8) < .001 
Adjusted for albumin, β2M    
    GR KIR3DS1 89 1.0  
    GR KIR3DS1+ 41 1.8 (1.2-2.8) .008 
    Bad risk KIR3DS1+ or KIR3DS1 33 2.7 (1.6-4.3) .001 
Adjusted for albumin, β2M, and cytogenetics    
    GR KIR3DS1 36 1.0  
    GR KIR3DS1 12 2.7 (1.2-6.2) .021 
    Bad risk KIR3DS1+ or KIR3DS 20 5.3 (2.4-11.7) < .001 

Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on (1) disease status at ASCT; (2) KIR3DS1 genotype; and (3) good risk KIR3DS1, good risk KIR3DS1+, poor-risk patients. The RR after further adjustment for albumin level, β2M level, and bone marrow cytogenetics are also shown.

RR indicates relative risk; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; GR, good risk; and β2M, β-2 microglobulin.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal