Table 4

Comparison of other genetic alterations between AML patients with and without the IDH1 mutation

VariantPercentage of patients with the gene mutation
P
Total patients (n = 493)IDH1-mutated patients (n = 27)IDH1 wild-type patients (n = 466)
NPM1 21.4 (105/493) 55.6 (15/27) 19.4 (90/466) < .001 
CEBPA 13.2 (65/493) 3.7 (1/27)) 13.8 (64/466) .134 
FLT3/ITD 23.4 (115/493) 37.0 (10/27) 22.6 (105/466) .083 
RUNX1 12.2 (60/493) 7.4 (2/27) 12.4 (58/466) .436 
WT1 6.3 (31/493) 0 (0/27) 6.7 (31/466) .166 
MLL/PTD 5.7 (28/493) 11.1 (3/27) 5.4 (25/466) .210 
FLT3/D835 7.5 (37/493) 11.1 (3/27) 7.3 (34/466) .465 
KIT 2.4 (12/493) 0 (0/27) 2.6 (12/466) .398 
JAK2 0.6 (3/493) 0 (0/27) 0.6 (3/466) .676 
PTPN11 4.1 (20/493) 7.4 (2/27) 3.9 (18/466) .364 
NRAS 11.5 (57/493) 14.8 (4/27) 11.4 (53/466) .586 
KRAS 3.3 (16/493) 0 (0/27) 3.4 (16/466) .328 
VariantPercentage of patients with the gene mutation
P
Total patients (n = 493)IDH1-mutated patients (n = 27)IDH1 wild-type patients (n = 466)
NPM1 21.4 (105/493) 55.6 (15/27) 19.4 (90/466) < .001 
CEBPA 13.2 (65/493) 3.7 (1/27)) 13.8 (64/466) .134 
FLT3/ITD 23.4 (115/493) 37.0 (10/27) 22.6 (105/466) .083 
RUNX1 12.2 (60/493) 7.4 (2/27) 12.4 (58/466) .436 
WT1 6.3 (31/493) 0 (0/27) 6.7 (31/466) .166 
MLL/PTD 5.7 (28/493) 11.1 (3/27) 5.4 (25/466) .210 
FLT3/D835 7.5 (37/493) 11.1 (3/27) 7.3 (34/466) .465 
KIT 2.4 (12/493) 0 (0/27) 2.6 (12/466) .398 
JAK2 0.6 (3/493) 0 (0/27) 0.6 (3/466) .676 
PTPN11 4.1 (20/493) 7.4 (2/27) 3.9 (18/466) .364 
NRAS 11.5 (57/493) 14.8 (4/27) 11.4 (53/466) .586 
KRAS 3.3 (16/493) 0 (0/27) 3.4 (16/466) .328 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal