Table 3

Univariate analysis of the impact of clinical parameters and molecular alterations on OS in AML patients with intermediate-risk karyotype (N = 171)

VariableOS, mo, median ± SDP
Age, y  < .001 
     ≤ 60 NR  
    > 60 12.3 ± 4.6  
WBC  .001 
    ≤ 50 000/μL NR  
    > 50 000/μL 14.5 ± 3.6  
NPM1+/FLT3-ITD  .080 
    Yes NR  
    Others 61.0  
CEBPA  .010 
    Double mutation NR  
    Others 22.0 ± 16.7  
RUNX1  .015 
    Mutated 14.5 ± 3.8  
    Wild NR  
TET2  .021 
    Mutated 14.7 ± 7.8  
    Wild NR  
ASXL1  .014 
    Mutated 10.0 ± 3.2  
    Wild NR  
VariableOS, mo, median ± SDP
Age, y  < .001 
     ≤ 60 NR  
    > 60 12.3 ± 4.6  
WBC  .001 
    ≤ 50 000/μL NR  
    > 50 000/μL 14.5 ± 3.6  
NPM1+/FLT3-ITD  .080 
    Yes NR  
    Others 61.0  
CEBPA  .010 
    Double mutation NR  
    Others 22.0 ± 16.7  
RUNX1  .015 
    Mutated 14.5 ± 3.8  
    Wild NR  
TET2  .021 
    Mutated 14.7 ± 7.8  
    Wild NR  
ASXL1  .014 
    Mutated 10.0 ± 3.2  
    Wild NR  

Only variables with P < 0.1 are shown. KRAS, NRAS, WT1, MLL-PTD, FLT3-TKD, cKIT, and IDH1 mutations, and many other clinical parameters, such as hemoglobin, platelet counts, and sex, were not significantly associated with survival (P > 0.1) in this group of patients with intermediate-risk karyotype, and so were not listed in the table.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal