Table 4

Concordance of MMR IS between reference method and field methods according to the performance characteristics of the 19 field methods that have undertaken the validation procedure for their current analytical systems

Field methods groupPerformance characteristics
Number of field methods (%)Number of validation samplesMMR by either reference method and/or field methodsMMR by reference method (% of all validation samples)MMR by field methods (% of all validation samples)MMR concordance (%)
Average difference, ±95% limits of agreement
1.2-fold ±5-fold 11 (58) 318 159 152 (48) 151 (47) 144 (91) 
1.2-fold > ±5-fold 6 (32) 193 94 83 (43) 79 (41) 70 (74) 
> 1.2-fold any 2 (10.5) 87 25 22 (25) 17 (20) 15 (60) 
Field methods groupPerformance characteristics
Number of field methods (%)Number of validation samplesMMR by either reference method and/or field methodsMMR by reference method (% of all validation samples)MMR by field methods (% of all validation samples)MMR concordance (%)
Average difference, ±95% limits of agreement
1.2-fold ±5-fold 11 (58) 318 159 152 (48) 151 (47) 144 (91) 
1.2-fold > ±5-fold 6 (32) 193 94 83 (43) 79 (41) 70 (74) 
> 1.2-fold any 2 (10.5) 87 25 22 (25) 17 (20) 15 (60) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal