Table 3

Ingenuity pathway analysis predicts differentially expressed canonical signaling pathways across the differentiated lineages of MSCs

PathwaysSample ID
A07A14C07C14O07O14
Axonal guidance signaling 3.67 7.4 — 2.16 1.81 1.42 
Complement and coagulation cascades 2.28 — 1.7 — 1.77 1.73 
EGF signaling 2.51 3.27 1.98 — 2.47 — 
ERK/MAPK signaling 3.02 4.02 1.98 1.89 2.98 1.54 
Integrin signaling 3.22 5.31 2.86 1.96 1.47 — 
Interferon signaling — 1.31 3.25 — 1.70 1.67 
Leukocyte extravasation signaling 2.19 1.47 — 1.93 1.63 1.56 
PDGF signaling 1.58 2.12 3.17 1.82 1.65 — 
TGF-β signaling — 2.00 2.28 3.82 2.29 — 
PathwaysSample ID
A07A14C07C14O07O14
Axonal guidance signaling 3.67 7.4 — 2.16 1.81 1.42 
Complement and coagulation cascades 2.28 — 1.7 — 1.77 1.73 
EGF signaling 2.51 3.27 1.98 — 2.47 — 
ERK/MAPK signaling 3.02 4.02 1.98 1.89 2.98 1.54 
Integrin signaling 3.22 5.31 2.86 1.96 1.47 — 
Interferon signaling — 1.31 3.25 — 1.70 1.67 
Leukocyte extravasation signaling 2.19 1.47 — 1.93 1.63 1.56 
PDGF signaling 1.58 2.12 3.17 1.82 1.65 — 
TGF-β signaling — 2.00 2.28 3.82 2.29 — 

Data are −log(P values). Pathways with −log(P value) greater than 1.3 (P < .05) in at least one sample (day 7 or day 14) were considered to be statistically differentially expressed in MSC differentiation. These pathways are predicted to be important in MSC differentiation to all 3 lineages. Since FGF signaling pathway was not significantly enriched in any sample, it is not represented in this table.

— indicates not available.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal