Table 6

Comparison of functional well-being between survivors and siblings

Functional well-beingSurvivors, no. (%)Siblings, no. (%)P
Currently married*    
    No 241 (45) 97 (31) — 
    Yes 300 (55) 220 (69) <.001 
Difficulty holding a job    
    No 435 (81) 311 (98) — 
    Yes 103 (19) 7 (2) <.001 
Difficulty obtaining health insurance    
    No 392 (74) 299 (95) — 
    Yes 135 (26) 15 (5) <.001 
Currently have health insurance§    
    No 55 (10) 16 (5) — 
    Yes 478 (90) 299 (95) .01 
Difficulty obtaining life insurance    
    No 190 (36) 266 (84) — 
    Yes 156 (30) 16 (5) — 
    Never tried 183 (34) 35 (11) <.001 
Currently have life insurance    
    No 232 (44) 77 (24) — 
    Yes 296 (56) 240 (76) d<.001 
Functional well-beingSurvivors, no. (%)Siblings, no. (%)P
Currently married*    
    No 241 (45) 97 (31) — 
    Yes 300 (55) 220 (69) <.001 
Difficulty holding a job    
    No 435 (81) 311 (98) — 
    Yes 103 (19) 7 (2) <.001 
Difficulty obtaining health insurance    
    No 392 (74) 299 (95) — 
    Yes 135 (26) 15 (5) <.001 
Currently have health insurance§    
    No 55 (10) 16 (5) — 
    Yes 478 (90) 299 (95) .01 
Difficulty obtaining life insurance    
    No 190 (36) 266 (84) — 
    Yes 156 (30) 16 (5) — 
    Never tried 183 (34) 35 (11) <.001 
Currently have life insurance    
    No 232 (44) 77 (24) — 
    Yes 296 (56) 240 (76) d<.001 

— indicates not applicable.

*

Six survivors and 2 siblings with missing data were excluded.

Nine survivors and 1 sibling with missing data were excluded.

Twenty survivors and 5 siblings with missing data were excluded.

§

Fourteen survivors and 4 siblings with missing data were excluded.

Eighteen survivors and two siblings with missing data were excluded.

Nineteen survivors and 2 siblings with missing data were excluded.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal