Table 1

Patient characteristics (peripheral blood samples)

PatientRai stageWBC, 109/LLymphocytes, %CD5+/ CD19+, %*CD3+, %IgVH mutational statusp53 statusCD38 (CD20+), %Chromosomal abnormalities§
CLL 01 II 113.0 90.0 88.3 4.4 Functional 81 None 
CLL 07 93.3 86.9 96.8 2.4 Functional 87 11q 
CLL 08 58.5 91.0 92.7 4.3 ND 24 None 
CLL 11 II 49.3 88.8 91.4 5.5 − Functional 92 13q 
CLL 12 72.2 86.3 93.0 5.0 Functional 33 None 
CLL 16 II 80.1 73.7 92.0 6.0 ND 39 13q 
CLL 17 II 102.0 92.1 93.3 4.1 − ND 47 None 
CLL 18 48.0 89.2 90.5 7.7 ND 29 ND 
CLL 20 II 61.4 89.0 95.0 4.0 Functional 20 ND 
CLL 21 IV 60.6 89.8 86.7 3.1 − ND 24 ND 
CLL 22 60.1 94.4 81.7 6.5 − Dysfunctional 44 17p 
CLL 23 IV 137.0 94.8 83.5 3.8 Dysfunctional 57 17p;13q 
CLL 25 79.0 93.3 84.7 3.4 − Dysfunctional 39 17p 
CLL 29 117.0 95.8 95.0 1.5 ND 9.5 ND 
CLL 31 II 68.8 94.7 90.8 4.7 ND 1.9 13q 
CLL 32 73.8 86.9 85.2 7.2 ND 2.4 ND 
CLL 40 IV 232.0 96.1 98.5 1.2 − ND 97 ND 
PatientRai stageWBC, 109/LLymphocytes, %CD5+/ CD19+, %*CD3+, %IgVH mutational statusp53 statusCD38 (CD20+), %Chromosomal abnormalities§
CLL 01 II 113.0 90.0 88.3 4.4 Functional 81 None 
CLL 07 93.3 86.9 96.8 2.4 Functional 87 11q 
CLL 08 58.5 91.0 92.7 4.3 ND 24 None 
CLL 11 II 49.3 88.8 91.4 5.5 − Functional 92 13q 
CLL 12 72.2 86.3 93.0 5.0 Functional 33 None 
CLL 16 II 80.1 73.7 92.0 6.0 ND 39 13q 
CLL 17 II 102.0 92.1 93.3 4.1 − ND 47 None 
CLL 18 48.0 89.2 90.5 7.7 ND 29 ND 
CLL 20 II 61.4 89.0 95.0 4.0 Functional 20 ND 
CLL 21 IV 60.6 89.8 86.7 3.1 − ND 24 ND 
CLL 22 60.1 94.4 81.7 6.5 − Dysfunctional 44 17p 
CLL 23 IV 137.0 94.8 83.5 3.8 Dysfunctional 57 17p;13q 
CLL 25 79.0 93.3 84.7 3.4 − Dysfunctional 39 17p 
CLL 29 117.0 95.8 95.0 1.5 ND 9.5 ND 
CLL 31 II 68.8 94.7 90.8 4.7 ND 1.9 13q 
CLL 32 73.8 86.9 85.2 7.2 ND 2.4 ND 
CLL 40 IV 232.0 96.1 98.5 1.2 − ND 97 ND 

Patient data for the lymph node samples used in this study can be found in Smit et al.10 

ND indicates not determined.

*

Percentage of cells positive for CD5 and CD19 surface expression.

Mutated IgVH gene (+) denotes more than 2% mutations compared with germline sequence.

p53 functional status was measured via radiation-induced RNA expression of p53 target genes Puma and Bax, or by p53 and p21 protein up-regulation via Western blot, as decribed in Mackus et al16  and Pettitt et al.25  Patient 25 had a so-called type A dysfunction.

§

As determined by FISH. Probes for 11q22.3 (ATM), 13q14 (D13S319), and 17p13 (TP53) were obtained from Abbott-Vysis. Samples with more than10% aberrant signals were considered abnormal.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal