Baseline characteristics
Study, year . | Patients, no. . | Mean or median follow-up, mo . | Study design . | Consecutive enrollment . | Lost at follow-up, no. . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appenzeller et al,28 2005 | 24 | 44 | Retrospective | Yes | 0 |
| Stolz et al,9,10 2005 | 79 | 31 | Prospective, retrospective | Yes | 2 |
| Ferro et al,1,27 2005 | 624 | 16 | Prospective | Yes | 8 |
| Favrole et al,11 2004 | 28 | 3 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
| Cakmak et al,14 2003 | 16 | 3 | Prospective | Yes | 0 |
| Breteau et al,21 2003 | 55 | 36 | Retrospective | Yes | 0 |
| Mehraein et al,15 2003 | 39 | 123 | Retrospective | Yes | NA |
| Baumgartner et al,12 2003 | 33 | 12 | Prospective | Yes | 0 |
| Buccino et al,13 2002 | 36 | 42 | Retrospective | No | 1 |
| Ferro et al,16 2002 | 142 | 22 | Prospective, retrospective | Yes | 7 |
| Strupp et al,17 2002 | 40 | 145 | Retrospective | No | NA |
| Fink and McAuley,18 2001 | 25 | 10.8 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
| Mak et al,20 2001 | 13 | 5-36* | Retrospective | Yes | 0 |
| de Bruijn et al,4,19 2001 | 59 | 18.5 | Retrospective | Yes | 4 |
| Lamy et al,22 2000 | 68 | 60 | Prospective | Yes | NA |
| Lleo et al,23 1999 | 17 | 26.33 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
| Preter et al,24 1996 | 110 | 77.8 | Retrospective | Yes | 25 |
| Rondepierre et al,25 1995 | 18 | 31 | Prospective | Yes | 0 |
| Bienfait et al,26 1995 | 62 | 3 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
Study, year . | Patients, no. . | Mean or median follow-up, mo . | Study design . | Consecutive enrollment . | Lost at follow-up, no. . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appenzeller et al,28 2005 | 24 | 44 | Retrospective | Yes | 0 |
| Stolz et al,9,10 2005 | 79 | 31 | Prospective, retrospective | Yes | 2 |
| Ferro et al,1,27 2005 | 624 | 16 | Prospective | Yes | 8 |
| Favrole et al,11 2004 | 28 | 3 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
| Cakmak et al,14 2003 | 16 | 3 | Prospective | Yes | 0 |
| Breteau et al,21 2003 | 55 | 36 | Retrospective | Yes | 0 |
| Mehraein et al,15 2003 | 39 | 123 | Retrospective | Yes | NA |
| Baumgartner et al,12 2003 | 33 | 12 | Prospective | Yes | 0 |
| Buccino et al,13 2002 | 36 | 42 | Retrospective | No | 1 |
| Ferro et al,16 2002 | 142 | 22 | Prospective, retrospective | Yes | 7 |
| Strupp et al,17 2002 | 40 | 145 | Retrospective | No | NA |
| Fink and McAuley,18 2001 | 25 | 10.8 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
| Mak et al,20 2001 | 13 | 5-36* | Retrospective | Yes | 0 |
| de Bruijn et al,4,19 2001 | 59 | 18.5 | Retrospective | Yes | 4 |
| Lamy et al,22 2000 | 68 | 60 | Prospective | Yes | NA |
| Lleo et al,23 1999 | 17 | 26.33 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
| Preter et al,24 1996 | 110 | 77.8 | Retrospective | Yes | 25 |
| Rondepierre et al,25 1995 | 18 | 31 | Prospective | Yes | 0 |
| Bienfait et al,26 1995 | 62 | 3 | Retrospective | No | 0 |
NA indicates not assessed.
Range.