Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis on combined genotypes



Genotype

No. of samples


Patient group
RAD51-135G/C
HLX1-C/T (3′ UTR)
Control
AML
OR (95% CI)
P
De novo AML       
    1   WT   WT   106   80   1.0*  —  
    2   WT   V   30   22   0.90 (0.47-1.71)   .75  
    3   V   WT   15   16   1.42 (0.66-3.06)   .37  
    4   V   V   4   5   1.80 (0.47-6.97)   .39  
t-AML       
    1   WT   WT   106   17   1.0*  —  
    2   WT   V   30   11   2.31 (0.96-5.57)   .06  
    3   V   WT   15   3   1.26 (0.32-4.87)   .74  
    4
 
V
 
V
 
4
 
5
 
9.50 (2.22-40.64)
 
.002
 


Genotype

No. of samples


Patient group
RAD51-135G/C
HLX1-C/T (3′ UTR)
Control
AML
OR (95% CI)
P
De novo AML       
    1   WT   WT   106   80   1.0*  —  
    2   WT   V   30   22   0.90 (0.47-1.71)   .75  
    3   V   WT   15   16   1.42 (0.66-3.06)   .37  
    4   V   V   4   5   1.80 (0.47-6.97)   .39  
t-AML       
    1   WT   WT   106   17   1.0*  —  
    2   WT   V   30   11   2.31 (0.96-5.57)   .06  
    3   V   WT   15   3   1.26 (0.32-4.87)   .74  
    4
 
V
 
V
 
4
 
5
 
9.50 (2.22-40.64)
 
.002
 

Variant (V) genotype includes all heterozygous and variant homozygous genotypes. Wild-type (WT) genotype comprises the homozygous genotype for the most common and frequent genotype. The AML patient groups have been compared with the control group and adjusted for age.

*

Used as reference group.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal